ExLisper

Yep, it doesn't look like a jackpot win. Jackpots are separate events that would have distinct screen. I don't believe she took a selfie with generic screen and not the jackpot screen so probably there was no jackpot screen.

En when you play you agree to terms and conditions saying that glitches don't count.

The summary is twice as long as the article. Shit algo.

How many sisters does he have? If it's less than 10 just saying it's his sister will 'borderline dox her'.

How does it work then? As I understand it depriving body of calories causes it to be more efficient with the calories it gets. What I'm missing? Maybe what you are still missing is that this effect will change depending on amount of calories we're talking about? I doubt there are studies measuring the effect of 100 calories deficit because it would be negligible. Of course if we get into real diet/moderate exercise the effects will change. Is this why you think the effect is different overall?

Yeah, I guess your right. Big companies like to throw money at online ad campaigns even when there's proof it doesn't do anything. Looks like IBM simply had some cash to burn and X looked like a nice furnace.

Ok, I guess it's possible they simply had to much money in the marketing division and were throwing money at X just to prop up the value of IBM brand, not to actually sell products. IBM's brand has been loosing value fast in the recent years so maybe they are just desperate? Of course this will have no impact at their revenue. Not showing ads on X will just save them money.

Jesus, why can't people just expose their drives to cosmic radiation and have it switch the bits in the file? So much time wasted writing useless editors.

This would only make sense if targeting rich individuals was somehow significantly more expensive. They're showing ads to very small group of X users. Their ads cost the same as other ads. They should not be spending more than companies selling consumer products.