ExLisper

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

OMG! Same. Well, almost. I'm running AwesomeWM, my gf has t480 and I have heard of Arch.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

They should refund it though, no?

There are services where you pay per view/limited time access. If I pay for permanent access and unlimited viewings then I should be refunded when this changes.

If Sony can't guarantee unlimited access they they should sell "one year", "five year" or "whatever they can guarantee" access and charge accordingly. If they don't refund it's a classic bait and switch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Are swimming pools using one swimming pool or water per swim? Per year? 5 years? 10 years?

I think you missed the 'per transaction' part. Which is kind of important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Repion - Brillante - if by 'currently' you mean this whole year.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Shit, that's why I had to go with [email protected] :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sorry for the long silence

No problem, we're all busy here.

Maybe you're right, maybe the metabolism changes will not kick in with 100 calories reduction.

Stil, even if all this is true (I mean, no need to get into the paywalled details) we're taking 4kg over 3 years which in many cases will be totally insignificant. Many people will not start eating more because they lost 4kg. But even if they will then, as this article says, eating 100 calories more doesn't require actually eating 'more' food, just a different one. Get a potato instead of a salad, get different type of bread, or a normal butter instead of 'diet' one. Figuring out if those changes are carbon negative or positive would be incredible difficult as they would depend on the specific products you're changing, where do you buy it and so on but my bet is they will be close to 0. I still think it would take way more than that to offset the carbon footprint of a Rumba.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago

Depends where you live. In some countries nothing. In other countries fines. In some death penalty.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon Musk's assistant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

My EV has 280km range and it's a bit short. I would prefer to have 450km.

Reasons:

  • charging above 80% is slow and bad for the baterry, you also don't go to 0% before charging. so on most days I don't actually have 280km range, more like 200km

  • I drive more during the weekend, usually just around 200-300km. I can charge for free at work but with 280 range I can't charge for the whole weekend which would be nice and would reduce my costs to nearly 0

  • on longer trips 280km means a stop for charging about every 2h. Make it 3h and it would be perfect

280km is enough for daily driving but in my case, 50% bigger battery would a big improvement overall.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Last year I bought new Citroen e-berlingo for 25.000€. It would be €32.000 without subsidies but still not 60.000.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If think it should be up to the team. If they think it's useful to meet at the office they go be it weekly, monthly or quarterly. My commute is like 15 minutes so I don't mind going to the office at all but the experiences is way worse now that it's hybrid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

GTFO, wrapped is the best. I get to learn I'm like top 0.5% listeners of my favourite bands. I'm the biggest fan! I win!

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί