El_Dorado

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Comment for visibility of this

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'd love to know that as well. So if you guys have any news let's have it

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

That's the lovely bit about putting a bill out there. The enforcement and feasibility is not the problem of the politicians anymore.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Well all you can say is bye bye and good luck

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haha yes definitely something to follow. I'm looking forward to lists of companies that left UK because of this (as announced) and lists of companies that stay and thus prove that their end-to-end encryption isn't a real one

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Haha yes also incredibly that they had to point out this sentence "Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible."

Very astonishing how there are some fundamental lacks of understanding from politicians advertising this. Or all on purpose

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeees nice share

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Do you refer to another source than the article? Because in their linked article it does not refer to several occasions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you talking about American schools?

If you are : dresscodes in schools are not as wide spread in Europe as they are in the US.

But in any case the article cites the reasoning behind sending the student home. And it was because of supposedly religious affiliate clothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is there a special discussion thread somewhere on Lemmy?