EdgeOfToday

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I mean it would be better if it was just Les Burney, but i guess that's a little too on the hose.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Right, no one saw bigfoot because the Haitians ate him. There's almost nothing the Haitians won't eat. /s

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can i take one of these to Hogwarts?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Well everyone nose about inflation, but what about a clown's right to shoes?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Mozart was a child prodigy. He started playing piano at age 4, and at age 5 he started composing piano pieces that are still played today. He wrote a symphony at age 8 and an opera at 14. There is a legend that as a child, he heard a choir sing an Allegri piece and went home and transcribed the entire thing from memory.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (16 children)

With a neural network, you wouldn't be able to mathematically prove that the signal is perfectly recovered 100% of the time for all possible inputs. That is the case with PNG and FLAC. If you're just listening to music and need a good compression ratio, then sure, it won't be a big deal if a couple of bits are wrong. But that's also why we have lossy compression. If the goal is to make signal degradation imperceptible to a human, then you could get a much better compression ratio using neural networks. If it's truly critical that the signal isn't corrupted, it would probably be better to just use the original method.