But they don't really have similar scopes... One is for technical models, based on extruded 2D drawings, the other is for abstract 3D modelling. Sure in both if them the end product is a 3D model, but they're achieved in vastly different ways with completely different skillsets and different use cases.
DreadPotato
joined 1 year ago
I wouldn't bother using it for anything other than starters, stale oxidised malt won't make good beer. Shit it, shit out.
max resolution of 720p in web browsers
What the fucking fuck!? That shit should be illegal AF if you pay for the 1080p or 4k tier...
How much miles weekly do you need to train
All of them I think...that must be the reason my weekly milage has been so low, this guy has been hawking them all!
The dude ran a fucking marathon every day for a year...that is absolutely insane!
My dad is pretty unhappy with his Mercedes EQS which costs significantly more than the model S, it also had issues with loose interior trim and panel gaps. And despite the fairly high price point its still riddled with shitty plastic interior. It kind of feels like all manufacturers are rushing stuff out the door at the cost of QC.
Because the price of these shoes is ridiculous and they don't last as long as regular shoes. I'm probably also not running anywhere near fast or efficient enough to properly utilise the benefits of them properly.
I have, it's really not very good IMO. It's half decent in English. but it sucks ass in my native language, half the suggestions it's giving are completely wrong or nonsensical in the context of the sentence.
How do you get the auto correct / language support to actually work? It's less than useless for me, it hardly ever provides suggestions or corrects typos and doesn't recognise a lot of regular words. Adjusting the aggressiveness/confidence in the settings does absolutely nothing.
I just wish the autocorrect would work...at the moment there is zero difference when I change how aggressive it is in the settings, and it barely makes any suggestions or corrections to typos.
The comment I originally commented on compared them as if they were similar tool, (before it was edited), which I simply pointed out it is not. It's like saying a plane and a helicopter are the same, sure they both are able to lift off the ground, but the similarities kind of stop there.