DeepGradientAscent

To an extent.

My professional ANN experience is with computer vision and object detection. A bit with image and sound GANs too.

LLMs that I've spent time training and experimenting with (and I argue GANs as a class of ANNs, in general) tend to "hallucinate" or "dream harder" after several tens of queries within the same instance.

But one can improve output "fidelity" based on constraint parameters on the user and inference self-check algorithms.

Addendum:

• ANN = artificial neural network (a class of algorithms in machine learning whose architecture resembles a mesh of intercommunicative neuron cells in nervous tissue)
• GAN = generative adversarial network (a categorical subset of ANNs
• LLM = large language model (a categorical subset of GANs)

Me too, I've just been downloading new APKs from the GitHub repo.

Paradoxically, tolerant societies can't tolerate intolerance.

The same applies to absolutism, the Sith, the Jedi, the Republic, and a long time ago, in a galaxy, far, far away.

I stand by my statement.

It's good for some people, in moderation. Not for others. Personally, I enjoy it.

Only Sith deal in absolutes.

The data on a site like that is ridiculously valuable. Sooner or later someone may decide to give a marketing company contracted by a big pharma company just one little peak at some data.

In the Untitled States, that data is protected via several statutes, HIPAA being the most widely known and robust governance over such information.

Thou shalt program with memory management as an axiomatic paradigm.

All praise the Omnissiah, so on, and so forth.

Cucker Tarlson

Masculinity and femininity are social constructs which ever change and ever differ based on subjective perception and what not, with no actual value or benefit to anyone's life.

I disagree.

Social constructs have value and utility.

In this case, masculine and feminine constructs have multi-billion dollar industries built around their perceived value, though their definitions are subjective and malleable. People put food on their table because of these social constructs. People make and write profound art and literature because of these social constructs.

O B E Y

@[email protected] , you should probably post a link to where @[email protected] makes these kind of statements.

There're a lot of fucked up authoritarian statist bullies on lemmygrad, no doubt, and this guy is on there, but back up your claims.

I am just an annoying grammar stickler, friend. I assume most mistakes are from typing on a mobile device or being a non-native English speaker, many times both.

My most severe gripes are the misuse and/or overuse of words like "like", "literally", "aggravate" and "jealousy", or when I see "would of" instead of "would've".

In a couple hundred years, the precision in English usage I pompously strain to uphold will be antiquated to the point of incomprehensibility. I admit that dying on this hill is a fool's errand.

Therefore, take my comment as light-hearted jest.

This is the way.