ChildeHarold

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

you probably didn't even refute my points anyways. just not worth it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

said the man who couldn't refute literally any of my points (and clearly didn't understand most of them in the first place)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

only lack of logic then? ok.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

reread your stuff. if you can't understand how it proves your own stupidity, then you really are hopelessly lost.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (11 children)

"I work in health care" Exhibits the intelligence of a ostrich

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (13 children)

you've given me all the proof I would need lmfao.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I really don't think you are smart enough. lol

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

there is a point where peaceful protest is not enough, you realize that, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

honestly it is the only way they can throw off the bourgeoisie. people who want to deprive the proletariat of guns are class traitors or posers from the bourgeoisie.

 

I’m trying to pick a DSLR-compatible Canon telephoto lens for wildlife photography in low-light conditions (also, I like doing urban candid photography/street photography from distances, so that too). Naturally, this means high ISO and low f-stop. For some reason, all I can find are like f-4; is that normal? Also, what’s with all the “telephoto” lenses that max out at 200mm? Shouldn’t something like 400mm be better? I suppose I don’t want something too bulky, so 400mm is probably pushing it but idk… if you have experience in this, let me know what you think. I can only seem to find a handful of options, and most are for mirrorless cameras which sucks because I don’t want too many camera bodies so getting ANOTHER one for this purpose would really clutter my shelves as I don’t have any mirrorless Canon’s.

Anyways, budget is tight, nothing north of $1000, let me know what you think!

Edit: Posted in wildlife photo community, but it was dead (no posts since like 2 months ago) so figured I'd move it here.

view more: next ›