Chapelgentry

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Nope, you're right. I did it in my head and forgot to multiply by 100. Good catch!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If so then wouldn't Green Party leaders be included?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yeah I remember that! I remember everyone talking about the 3% threshold where (if I remember correctly) the green party would be included in debates and receive federal campaign funds. Hell, if they couldn't do it at the height of Nader always I don't see that happening now, particularly under Stein.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

Wait, the Green Party only had 300k members at it's peak? That's 0.001% of the American population. Why are all the tankies in here talking about how voting for Stein will make a difference? That's not even enough to consider her a contender in most states, much less for the whole country.

Edit: should be 0.1%. My bad and thanks for the correction!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, feel free. It's your vote. Hope you have the same energy to wag your finger at genocide when Republicans kick it into overdrive. Hope your disapproval is strong enough to get you off your couch to do something about it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So your options are: vote for ultra-genocide, vote for disapproving genocide, or vote for ultra-genocide but you feel good about it. Great options.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

World leaders throughout history do that with dictators. Your solution would be to start wars over public insults? Dictators aren't going to take public insults lightly, particularly those with nuclear capability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'd imagine that having no allies in the Middle East isn't a strategically sound plan. If Israel is going to do their thing anyway and can arm themselves we gain nothing by rebuke. The only way we could enact real change would be to threaten or attack our only ally in the region which is self-defeating and doesn't solve the problem.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the easiest way to prove he didn't is to prove someone else did. I don't think he will be able to do that easily, particularly because I think he made those posts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I think it's a matter of decorum. In general we shouldn't attack people's kids (when they're minors) for normal occurrences, even if their a public figure.

I was against bashing Barron when he was a minor, and I'm against bashing Gus until he's of legal age. In general, however, I refrain from bashing people and would encourage the same decorum from others.

Being able to criticize is not open license to do so in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Him, most other world leaders, most of the populace, etc etc. Under your definition nearly everyone is an evil piece of shit. /Shrug

view more: ‹ prev next ›