BarrelAgedBoredom

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Did you miss the part where I said vote for Kamala? Twice?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I'm ideologically opposed to party and institutional politics on a foundational level. The fact that people are forced to compromise on their values, the "lesser of two evils" system, the whole "closest to your values" thing is a horrible way to approach politics. It rings true if you don't think about it too hard but it's pretty bullshit. At the end of the day, when you are only permitted a political voice at the ballot box, you are forcing yourself into the labels you've been given by a group of parasites that do not share your interests..

And yeah, single.issue voters probably have other issues. That doesn't mean they fit within their chosen party's platform. There are plenty of pro-lifers who fit better in the democratic camp on other issues but value abortion above the rest. I'm not saying it makes sense or is worthy of respect. It's simply a thing that is

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You people? Please enlighten me, who am I?

Sorry that I'm maintaining some degree of this esoteric concept known as having principles. If extremely mild criticism is enough to upset you then I'm not really interested in anything you've got to say. Take it easy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I understand that but they're still in the party. AOC and Omar are Social Democrats but they still run under the Democrat ticket, for example. On the right we see a mix of right libertarians, fascists, Christian nationalists, white nationalists, esoteric fascistss, and neo-monarchists (I'm sure I'm missing a few), but they're all running under the Republican ticket because our two party system is broken and incapable of capturing the sheer depth and diversity of political ideologies within the country. The labels of democrat and republican are largely useless on an interpersonal basis and only vaguely useful on a systemic scale.

I'm an anarchist but my voter registration says democrat because I checked that box when I was 18 and never bothered changing it. You'd be "right" to call me a democrat, but only to a superficial and largely unimportant degree. I'm sure there are republicans in a similar situation as well and people who may be closer to democrats but choose to vote Republican due to specific policy issues. Abortion is one that comes to mind. It may be hard to believe but there truly are people out there who only care about abortion and otherwise have no strong political opinions outside of that. They would be a better fit for Republicans than Democrats. Again, the 2 party system is fucked and splitting hairs over people who don't nearly fit into one of the boxes (which is 99.9% of people) is a pointless distraction

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Broadly I agree with you and have said more or less the same thing. But there are people who label themselves republican and fall in line somewhere closer to democrat. The two parties aren't as far apart as we'd all like to think

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Kamala came in with some lip service to progressives at the beginning and has essentially adopted bidens platform with little in the way of changes. She's doubled down on fracking, distanced herself from the green new deal, and courted the center right (Democrat or Republican) from the DNC forward. It's not surprising but it's disheartening to see so many people get fooled by what has been the typical Democrat playbook since the 90s. Biden was bad optics so they traded him out. Vote for her because she isn't trump, but don't pretend that she'll do anything different than follow the party line like her and everybody before her.

If you want to make some real change go ahead and vote for the Democrat. Then stop paying attention to electoral politics. Organize in your community. Agitate for worker unions in your work places and tenant unions in your neighborhood, start a political theory reading group, organize a food drive, free store, tool library, something. Literally anything other than wasting your precious time and energy on following the clown show in DC. None of them care about you. None of them want to help you. None of them are planning to make your life easier.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

"NYPD mass shooting over $2.90" dates it pretty well I'd say. Until cops start more mass shootings over subway fare that is. Story for anyone who's interested

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I took the hit. They're trying to say that he mixed up "immigrants" and "migrants". He absolutely did not. You can hear it clear as day

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Asexual hermit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

You're a kind person and considerate lover. Bit of a drama queen though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Yoshi in Mario kart and sheik in smash. What am I like?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Informal text communication has increasingly played with punctuation and grammar to indicate tone, emotion, and cadence. This has been happening for decades. Language is a tool that is fluid and malleable. There are only rules insofar as there is broad consensus on how language works at the moment. Stop being a weenie

 

I couldn't find a "grammar help" community so I thought this might be a good place to pose this question. Sorry for asking something that boils down to "please help me with my homework" but I'm at a loss. I'm supposed to be using MLA format.

Here's the text I'm quoting:

"While recognizing the critical potential of the dystopic imagination, this volume examines it as a form of urban representation; the modern city, after all, appears to be an instantiation of a dystopic form of society."

Here's my sentence:

Prakash notes the utility of dystopian media, stating "this volume examines it as a form of urban representation; the modern city, after all, appears to be an instantiation of a dystopic form of society." (3)

Is this right? Should I have the period at the end of the parentheses? I tried looking through my textbook and a few online articles but I couldn't find an example with a parenthetical citation and a quote that includes a period. Thanks for the help!

 
 

I have to write a paper about a place/time that I have an emotional attachment to or a place that has shaped my sense of self. I haven't really felt much of an attachment to anything for most of my life. Even if I did, I wouldn't even know how to begin describing the nature or cause of that attachment. I chose to write about the woods by my childhood home because I spent a lot of time there as a kid but I couldn't tell you how I felt about it in the moment or even how I feel about it now. I literally don't have the words

 

I've finally fallen in love with reading again over the last year. Problem is I've only been reading non-fiction. it makes my brain hurt. I'd like to have some stuff I can turn to when attempting to read gender trouble gives me another headache. I don't have any particular preference for genre. I used to read fantasy, historical fiction, dystopian stuff but I'm more than happy to explore other genres as well!

A short list of things I've read for reference:

  • The saxon stories, Bernard Cornwell
  • LOTR, the hobbit
  • 1984
  • The road, Cormac McCarthy
  • The plague dogs, Richard Adams
 

Had this epiphany last night when we went to an asian fusion place. The similarities are uncanny

view more: next ›