AlolanVulpix

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

McGill Centre for Media, Technology & Democracy on Bluesky

This #elxn45 and beyond, understanding our digital public sphere is more important than ever. At the Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy, we track these currents closely.

Sign up for our newsletter for sharp analysis, new research & more: https://www.mediatechdemocracy.com/subscribe

Sign up for our newsletter. Centre for Media, Technology, and Democracy. Be the first to hear about the Centre's work, publications, events, and opportunities.

 

Electoral Renewal Canada on Bluesky

The Longest Ballot Committee (@longestballot.bsky.social) is a political organization in Canada that has been contesting Canadian elections since the 2021.

They protest Canada’s elections by flooding individual districts with dozens of independent candidates. But why do they take this approach?

an unfilled (presumably Canadian) voting ballot with 84 candidates, the vast majority being Independent candidates.

The core of their message is straightforward:

Politicians should not be in charge of making the rules for their own elections.

It's true, there is an inherent conflict of interest in allowing politicians to be the decision makers in this respect, and it’s not just limited to the election system.

One tool to help improve decision-making is the use of Citizen’s Assemblies.

Dozens of randomly selected citizens work together to make decisions through careful discussion and consensus.

Here's information from an assembly held in Yukon last year: www.yukoncitizensassembly.ca

In the disinformation age, our institutions face real threats to their legitimacy. Strengthening them and reclaiming legitimacy must include an openness to new ways of making decisions.

That change can start with a National Citizen’s Assembly on Electoral Reform:

nationalcitizensassembly.ca

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

2025 must be the last federal election under first-past-the-post.

It's time for proportional representation.

#cdnpoli #Election2025

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Nigel Farage's Reform Party may win a majority government with just 28% of the vote at the next UK election.

First-past-the-post needs to be abolished from the face of the planet.

It’s time for proportional representation.

A political map of Great Britain showing projected parliamentary seats based on a FindOutNow survey from April 2, 2025. Each constituency is coloured to represent the projected winning party. The accompanying chart shows seat projections: Reform UK (REF) 326 seats (up 321), Labour (LAB) 92 seats (down 319), Liberal Democrats (LD) 80 seats (up 8), Conservatives (CON) 65 seats (down 56), Scottish National Party (SNP) 44 seats (up 35), Greens (GRN) 7 seats (up 3), and Plaid Cymru (PLAID) 4 seats (unchanged). The map is colour-coded accordingly: purple for Reform, red for Labour, orange for Lib Dems, blue for Conservatives, yellow for SNP, green for Greens, and dark green for Plaid. Most of England is purple, Scotland is predominantly yellow, and Wales is a mix of purple, green, and dark green. The logo "Stats for Lefties" appears in the top right.

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Canada already has politicians who spread conspiracies on everything from LGBTQ rights to vaccines to immigration.

First-past-the-post doesn’t block them—it hides them in big parties that can win all the power with 40% of the vote.

Demand proportional representation.

#cdnpoli #Election2025

Flowchart titled "Power of extremists by voting system." It compares how an extremist politician can gain power under two systems: First-past-the-post (top path) and Proportional representation (bottom path). Under First-past-the-post, the extremist becomes leader of a major party, the party wins 100% power with 39% of the vote, and the extremist leads the country. Under Proportional, the extremist becomes leader of a small party, the party wins a proportional block of seats, and the impacts of the extremist are limited. A footnote defines political extremism using Wikipedia and Cambridge Dictionary.

 

Electoral Renewal Canada on Bluesky

At my talk at uOttawa, someone asked if our election system made it possible to win a majority government with just 30% of the vote.

Here's your answer: it absolutely is possible.

Proportional representation can't come soon enough.

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Critics are calling for change as Canada heads into #Election2025 still using first-past-the-post.

It’s time for a system that reflects how we vote. #cdnpoli

Watch the @ctvnewswindsor.bsky.social clip here! youtu.be/ZPMeHoj2bfY?...

 

Solveig Christina on Bluesky

Lots of NDP and Green Party signs in my neighborhood. Great partners for the Liberals but voting for a smaller party in Canada's first-past-the-post system risks a Conservative government. We need proportional representation now, @mark-carney.bsky.social

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Here in Canada, first-past-the-post means Trump sympathizers could win a majority with less than 50% of the vote.

That’s why we need proportional representation—so no party can take control of our government without a true majority.

#cdnpoli

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Let’s hope this new party learns from the mistakes that destroyed the BC Liberals/United and backs proportional representation this time.

#bcpoli @karinkirkpatrick.bsky.social

NEW - Former BC Liberal/BC United MLA @karinkirkpatrick.bsky.social has launched a new political party called Centre BC. It comes after Kevin Falcon withdrew BC United from the provincial election but remains the party leader. #bcpoli

elections.bc.ca/docs/fin/Reg...

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Over 1,600 volunteers.

300,000+ doorhangers.

Nearly 70% of Canadians support us.

The time for proportional representation is now. Let’s make history—politicians must get on the right side of it.

Join us! Sign up here: secure.fairvote.ca/en/action/el...

#cdnpoli #Election2025

A pie chart shows the results of a national poll by EKOS conducted from January 22–29, 2025, asking Canadians if they support moving to a system of proportional representation. 68% support, 19% oppose, and 13% don’t know. The chart highlights the 68% support in bright green.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

I couldn't do it alone. We have decades of broken promises on proportional representation promises to thank.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Let's call it a rainbow coalition 🟥🟧🟨🟢🩵!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Additional context:

  1. Carleton is the Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's riding.
  2. The Longest Ballot Committee overloads the ballot with candidates (usually 100+) to advertise the absurdity of FPTP, and push for proportional representation.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

I have done all of those things and will continue to do them in the future

Thanks! Let's keep growing the PR movement!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn't just about a party not following "promises exactly" - it's about a fundamental democratic reform promised and then deliberately abandoned. The electoral reform promise wasn't a minor policy detail; it was presented as a pillar of their platform with Trudeau stating it over 1,800 times.

When a government makes a major promise about democratic reform and then breaks it, it directly undermines their democratic legitimacy to make all other promises. This pattern goes back a century - Liberals have campaigned on proportional representation since 1919, starting with Mackenzie King.

In 2024, Trudeau even admitted they were "deliberately vague" about electoral reform to appeal to advocates while never intending to implement proportional representation.

Housing promises matter deeply, but they're built on the same democratic foundation that was undermined by this broken commitment. A government elected through a system where millions of votes don't count is structurally limited in its ability to represent Canadians' actual preferences on any issue, housing included.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~That's because it's the same organization!!~~

Edit: while not the same organization, they have the same mission: critical analysis of information and mass media. Read more at House hippo on Wikipedia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

This means that as angry as I am at the Liberals for the FPTP stab-in-the-back, that very FPTP system now requires that I vote Liberal for the sake of my country.

I am not happy about this.

Then after the election, you better be fighting your hardest to get proportional representation.

Get started with this link: Simple things you can do right now, to grow the proportional representation movement—so we never have to vote for the lesser of the evils, have a two party system, "split the vote", or strategic vote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›