AkumaFoxwell

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Philosophy Cop in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks, great explanation!

Philosophy Cop in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can someone explain the difference between "poetic language" and "dialectically coming to the truth"?

You get a tax break! You get a tax break! You all get a tax break! in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, you can be happy that they donated money to a cause. But billionaires are the reason donations and philanthropy are necessary in the first place. You don't become a billionaire unless you're doing unethical shit and/or exploiting a lot of people (there's inheritance, but that's another problematic topic altogether).

You get a tax break! You get a tax break! You all get a tax break! in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

My point is don’t hate the player, hate the game.

Some players have enough wealth to make the rules of the game. So I have to disagree.

Not counting games that were unfun because of bugs, what’s the most unfun video game that you’ve played and what made it unfun? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

(who’s background is developing gambling games)

Sure, he worked in the sector, but that's because he couldn't find better jobs. What you're implying here is really unfair, especially considering there aren't even any microtransactions in the game. As far as I know, he just made a game that he felt was fun.