5wim

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's actually "666"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's what the comment you replied to starts with.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Your comment makes sense in the frame of "ugly people are allowed to make music," my comment refers to the "music was better" part of the post.

The ugly people you mentioned don't support your comment's argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not "better."

Some music sucked in the boomer's days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (8 children)

But the contention is about music being better, and that's some bad music.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Like tent poles and aircraft ĥulls. Checks out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm aware, and agree

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Well I think you bought "Aluminum Free," whereas the one on the left doesn't say that. That brand sells both aluminum-full snd aluminum-free.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Dammit this whole post was an ad pack it up boys

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The bootlicking version of "why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?"

view more: ‹ prev next ›