0x0

It's a meme, I'm not writing comprehensive policy here

I'm responding to your comment, not the post. This part:

If a disabled person ... their disability should therefore ....

You really can't make generalizations about disabilities like this.

Lots of people think disabilities are visible and easy to categorize. They're not, and this attitude leads to scenarios like random people harassing actually disabled people for using a handicapped parking spot.

My point is, like, mind your own business and don't make judgy proclamations about what disabled people can do.

I don't think you know what you're talking about. Disabilities are really diverse and the US at least has shit healthcare. I can totally imagine someone using the last of their strength or energy to get back into their car. I wish everyone returned their carts, too, but I have empathy for people who just hit the end of their rope.

The darned neural implant generation doesn't even know how to doomscroll with their fingers. Kids these days smh no cap.

Yikes, I had no idea. Please tell me there's nothing wrong with glass bottles.

This all hinges on when you count the number of problems you have. But that's why you have two eyes! Read the same page of books 1 and 2 in parallel and obliterate 100% of your problems.

And because the eminently recyclable aluminum cans are somehow not good enough.

I was thinking mowing at night is the worst time because the morning dew would promote mold growth while the blades of grass are most damaged. But I'm just making shit up.

The classical options are that the world will end in the future, is currently ending, or ended in the past. Today, I'm here to tell you that there is another option: the world never even existed. Poof!

I think the judge would know it when they see it and laugh them out of the court room.

This is like comparing paintings to the Mona Lisa. Shrek is the crowning achievement of our civilization.

Great question. I don't know.

I think most would agree though, that the absence of a good solution does not justify a poor solution.

I guess that anyone in the country who seeks out and obtains the illegal content is committing a crime, so the government could go after them through traditional means. (Although seriously, are we really going to punish regular people for accessing a social media site?)

Admittedly, banning an entire website at the ISP is far more effective. However, I'd argue it's effective in the same way that a cannonball is an effective flyswatter.