this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
526 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Man, it sure would be nice if the person who orchestrated all this would face some sort of repercussions

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There's a theory that they're working towards that. Convict the small fish while gathering evidence and establishing the truth. Maybe even get some to turn and inform. You don't shoot at the king and miss.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

3.5 years just to indict the small fries, let alone convict before going after the big fish. Trump is going to be dead before consequences from Arizona land on him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Well yes, but also Arizona's current attorney general was only sworn in at the beginning of last year after her predecessor wasn't really interested in following up on this.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, that argument may have worked 1 or 2 years ago, but the thing is that there is a deadline for nailing him. If he gets reelected then that ship has sailed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He won't get reelected, period.

Do people forget that he fucking lost the election while being a sitting president?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

While I sure hope you are right, I fear that he just might get reelected (by the EC, anyway).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

It took awhile to get Copone and that was just on taxes. These sorts of cases take awhile to build up even when they are going fast. luckily they tend to be exponential after awhile so we may see some speed up eventually.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Seems like a problem when you can't prosecute people for trying to steal an election within an election cycle. It seems absolutely batshit to me that they're going to be allowed to participate in a democracy that they tried to overthrow. It's one thing telling people to get out there and vote against them, but these treasonous fuckers cheated last time and they're going to do it again.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Roger Stone?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

The whole GOP should be charged with conspiracy and treason

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It’s been so damn long, I was starting to wonder if what they did wasn’t technically a crime, for some weird reason you’d have to be a legal expert to understand.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They don't come after you until they have an airtight case. They do now, and they have them admitting to it on tape that they themselves made, lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Supreme Court will interpret the constitution in their favour

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Yup. It'll be delayed and appealed into the ground. They operate in a different legal system than you and I

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The technicality is the large cult following, shitloads of money, and regulatory capture.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is still unacceptable. How fucking long are we letting these traitors roam free?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Building a solid case takes time. You don't want them to win. You don't want them to go free on appeal. You want it done right. NAL, just relaying context someone else pointed out to me when I had the same complaint.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

You know what happens when you attack every other head than the immortal one on a Hydra? They grow back.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

All charges that have been filed include felony counts of fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Fake Patriots.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Specifying the party of the attorney general is irrelevant to serving justice. The piece is written solely for more clicks from conservative outrage over the "liberal conspiracy". Bad NBC, bad!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The state Republican Party documented the signing of the certificate in a social media post and sent it to Congress and the National Archives.

Send the elector choice back to the legislatures.” Ward was a consistent propagator of false claims that Arizona’s election results were rigged.

Others charged include: state legislators Anthony Kern and Jake Hoffman; Michael Ward, Kelli Ward’s husband; Tyler Bowyer, the RNC’s Arizona committeeman and the chief operating officer of the Trump-aligned Turning Point USA; Greg Safsten, the former Arizona GOP executive director; former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon; Robert Montgomery, the former head of the Cochise County GOP; and Republican Party activists Samuel Moorhead, Nancy Cottle and Loraine Pellegrino.

The Arizona charges are the latest example of Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election sprouting into legal cases during his 2024 bid to retake office.

Attorney Kenneth Chesebro, one of the planners of the alleged scheme, pled guilty last year in Georgia on conspiracy charges brought against him, Trump and 17 others in the state.

He is also believed to be one of the unidentified co-conspirators described by Special Counsel Jack Smith in his federal election interference indictment of Trump last year.


The original article contains 701 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Thank you, this is great!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

down for some more justice!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The fuck is that and where is it so I can stay the fuck away from it. Its in the western Appalachians isnt it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I'm sure these fake electors and their whining apologists will whine about how it's all so unfair. They should be glad they are not in front of a firing squad for what they tried to do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

If this had been done 2 years ago, it wouldn't be the mess it is now. Why the fuck did it take this long to get after it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

When Giuliani was Mayor, he boasted of having homeless beggars arrested. I am happy that he's getting a taste of his own medicine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Too bad Trump is an "unindicted co-conspirator"