this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23274 readers
2982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Plainclothes Chicago police officers fired nearly 100 gunshots over 41 seconds during a traffic stop that left one man dead and one officer injured, according to graphic video footage a police oversight agency released Tuesday.

Five officers from a tactical unit who were in an unmarked police vehicle surrounded an SUV last month driven by Dexter Reed, allegedly for failing to wear a seatbelt. Video shows the 26-year-old Black man briefly lowering a window and then raising it and refusing to exit the vehicle as more officers arrived, yelled commands and drew weapons.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I wish we lived in a world where we could readily believe this statement.

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability said preliminary evidence showed Reed fired first, injuring an officer in the Humboldt Park neighborhood on the city’s West Side.

Rather than assuming that they probably shot their own officer in their excitement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure the cameras that they were wearing caught the first shot being fired.

Also the angle of attack of the shot that hit the officer could point back to where the shot came from.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Still not good enough for our narrative.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No mention in the Lemmy summary of this post of who shot first?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No mention in your bio that you're unable to read the article before commenting?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No mention in your bio that you’re unable to read the article before commenting?

I did actually, which is why I came back and made my comment on this post.

I'm purposely criticizing the person who made the summary of the post, as it tends to indicate trying to direct a conversation in a certain way, without expressing all the summary facts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would surrounding a vehicle with gunmen who get out of an unmarked vehicle be a proper response to not wearing a seatbelt?

Imagine if we just sent the ticket to their house and didn't hold up traffic with the dash/rear cameras like a speed trap would do. No officers in danger, no people feeling in danger.

Unmarked vehicles in themselves are questionable. 5 officers in 1 vehicle.. strange

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I never said any of that.

All I stated was that the summary was crafted in such a way as to not present all the available facts to the readers.

My understanding is a police officer was shot first, by the driver. None of that was mentioned in the summary.

Do I believe the police forces throughout the nation have a huge problem that need fixing? Absofuckinglutely.

But we're not going to fix things if we don't look at the whole truth of a situation, and only the partial truth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But we're not going to fix things if we don't look at the whole truth of a situation, and only the partial truth.

That's what a summary is tho ... simply a portion of the whole.

The complete story is in the article. Therefore read it first before commenting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

brief statement or account of the main points of something.

No, it is not simply a portion of the whole.

Therefore read it first before commenting.

I sincerely hope you are an AI or a child because you're demonstrating an incredible lack of awareness here.

Edit: imagine disputing this, Jesus christ you people are dumb.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

If random ARMED men ever Approach me I'll be sure to NOT fight back in case they are Cops who can LEGALLY kill me!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

He shot at the cops. They fired back. What's to understand?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Plain clothes officers in an unmarked car with guns drawn on him for a seatbelt violation. How is somebody supposed to differentiate them from any other gang calling themselves "police"?

He shot in self defense. Period.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

He shot at plain clothes police officers with an unmarked car that didn't announce themselves as police in the video I saw, but they turned their video on after the encounter started.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Mmm... cop's boot" (You on the Internet)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We're talking about trying to murder another human. Stop dehumanising them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Nearly 100 shots. Cops love shooting people. Stop treating them as anything more than State-sanctioned deviants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

According to additional information, they were in an unmarked car and not uniformed officers. So for all intents and purposes, a random group of people.

How do you expect someone to react to a seemingly random group of people approaching a vehicle and demanding they get out? Sounds like self defense in that context.

We need all the information, with body cam video. Police have lied about these situations before to protect their shitty decisions. Their report cannot be trusted by itself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Random people? Unmarked cars put on lights to pull people over

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The other day a car that was very obviously not a cop lit up some lights and ran a red light I was stopped at. Turns out you can just buy lights.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

True. So...you'd start shooting too?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Wow it's genuinely disturbing that so many people here think attempting murder is an appropriate response to getting pulled over. Yeesh people.