this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
175 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A PAC controlled by former President Donald Trump that has devoted tens of millions of dollars to his and his allies’ legal bills could be running out of cash after spending nearly $3.7 million on legal fees in March.

Save America, Trump’s leadership PAC, has now spent $59.5 million on legal consulting since the start of 2023. It also incurred $886,000 in new legal debt in March, according to a report filed with the Federal Election Commission late Saturday. More than $1.1 million of its March spending went toward two firms representing Trump in his New York criminal hush money trial.

The total spent on legal expenses for Save America was almost as much as Trump’s campaign committee in the month of March, highlighting how legal troubles have sucked up the cash of his political operation. Trump’s official campaign committee spent just over $3.7 million in March, with travel expenses, followed by payroll, occupying its biggest expenditure categories.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The shoes and bibles didn't work? Time to open up a casino. No one ever lost money owning a casino.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In Trump's defense (not really), his casinos were likely just laundering money.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully, all moneys sent to the GOP for any candidate for any office ends up paying for Trump's legal bills.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh please happen before election.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

MORE!!!

Let's hope no Russia bail out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I want China to bail them out… I really want to watch their flock of morons try to reconcile “china good” with the last 10 years of rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

What about the last 10 years would make you think that logic will be an effective way to expose their hypocrisy?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I was amazed that Trump's Truth Media tanked as badly as it did. I figured some mysterious figures would be happy to inject a few billions into his coffers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

And the idiotic masses will still obediently vote for the person with an 'R' next to their name. The tribalism and propaganda has brainwashed like 40% of the population into blindly trusting Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

i wonder how many lawyers, in total, are currently representing Trump in his various legal proceedings. Does anyone have a tally? Does Trump, himself, even know?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He goes through them so fast it's hard to keep track.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

i don't know how that could possibly look good on a resume

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Given the ridiculous numbers thrown around I have to believe it's a kickback scheme for Trump.

Trump takes $50 million in PAC money. Trump pays $50 million to Trump lawyers Inc of which Trump owns 90%. Lawyers get paid $5 million, Trump pockets $45 million.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

You forgot the part where Trump reneges on paying the lawyer that $5 million, forcing that lawyer to spend his own money to sue Trump as Trump finds another lawyer to string along and defend him, until it’s time to turn his back on that lawyer, and so on…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

The way this article is written really annoys me. The headline talks about a super PAC, but it begins talking about Trump's PAC. "Super PAC" is a specific term referring to organizations that are not allowed to directly coordinate with campaigns (and they can have large, anonymous donations, which is where a lot of the "dark money" in politics comes from).

Here's the actual meat the headline is referring to:

Save America, Trump’s leadership PAC, was able to stay in the black in March due to another $5 million refund in March from Make America Great Again Inc., the Trump-backing super PAC. The super PAC has transferred $5 million to the leadership PAC each month going back to last July, with less regular transfers before then.

The leadership PAC initially seeded the super PAC with $60 million before he announced his candidacy. Now, MAGA Inc. can only send $2.75 million more back to Save America, raising questions about whether Save America will continue to be the vehicle to fund legal bills in several cases linked to Trump.

Basically, the only reason that the super PAC is involved with paying for Trump's legal bills in the first place is because Trump's PAC is paying for the legal bills, and the super PAC is returning the "startup loan" that was given to them originally.

The point is, the well is drying up fast and Trump's PAC is going to be out of money real soon, and he'll have to rely on super PACs to campaign for him entirely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Wasn't he charging to use his plane? I bet most of the "travel" expenses went to his plane and his hotels.