Fuck Activision
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
245 points (96.9% liked)
Gaming
19991 readers
69 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Fuck Bobby kotick
Til all are one.
Just stop buying their “games”
Oh I mean “live services” that are broken on release, designed to charge you for everything and will be taking offline the moment it’s no longer profitable.
How about gamers stop throwing money away and enabling this shit company to absorb everything around it and making worse and worse games. But that won’t happen. Y’all have the conviction of sliced bread when it comes to preordering.
Pick up some good indie games already.
2069 - Disney acquires Microsoft. Doomguy and the Master Chief are now Disney princesses.
You will have Game Pass. You will only have Game Pass.
Or just don’t buy it. 🤷♂️
Not that difficult to say no to an abusive company.
Not that difficult to say no to an abusive company.
It is very hard to say no to an abusive company. I guarantee you purchase something from an abusive company. You're not going to consumerism your way our of consumerism.
lol. Mister why bother with anything over here.
You can make decisions on what you support. You don’t have to be perfect and boycott literally every company to make a difference.
People don’t have control over every choice but enough to matter. Especially in regards to entertainment.
There is extremely limited entertainment that is not based on abuse. It gets worse obviously outside of entertainment but I think you'd have a hard time naming any entertainment company of scale that isn't abusive.
Then there's the fact that you'd be using a device built on abuse to play the entertainment.
This is always just some corporate propaganda so entrenched that you think you can not buy a product to make change. Yet companies like Nestle can be well known for seeing water as a luxury and using literal child saves to harvest cocoa while being profitable year after year.
Game studios like Blizzard need labor rights and unions not people saying they'll hold them accountable online by not buying a video game while Diablo 4 becomes one of the fastest selling games of all time. You're just spending lip service to the corporate elite and chasing after a solution that doesn't hold them accountable.
Yes literally every screen, console and movie player is built on abuse, so let’s not do anything about the companies that do openly abuse their employees and customers. It’s all bad anyways so might as well do nothing with your thumb up your ass.
Nestle does horrible things and literally has killed children but let’s do nothing and buy their products anyways. Not like there are multiple nestle boycott groups all over the internet spreading awareness. No they are just wasting their time.
You can stand up against abuse from one company while being unable to do much about another.
Doing nothing gets you nowhere. I’m not saying choosing to support a company or not is the end all be all but it is the damn minimum you can do. Unions and laws against monopolies is what we need.
I don't understand if you misread or are just too upset here but I never advocated for doing nothing. I advocated for doing something while consumerism is doing nothing. It's the same bullshit plastic companies sold us about recycling and now the whole planet is covered in plastic.
I also don't understand what the hell you mean about laws against monopolies, those exist and those are literally why MS didn't buy ABK like a year ago. Oligopolies are just as problematic if not more problematic than monopolies.
You keep "standing up against abuse" by not buying video game. I hope I am wrong and it fixes everything.
I can understand this comment for something like an abusive mineral miner in Africa selling electronics parts, or a food corporation that makes shared ingredients. Video games, though, are much more of a finished product, and easy to find competition for.
All major game companies abuse their employees. I agree with not giving them money but it will do nothing. The way people fight abusive employers is with with unions and organizing not with giving money to the other company that abuses employees.
Diablo 4 made sales records amongst the most I have ever seen gamers saying they will boycott something. I want to be wrong, I want this to do something but I see absolutely no information to support that. Meanwhile I do see regulations and unions making change in the real world.
I was disappointed to hear allegations of toxic work environments in Moon Studios, the people who made indie darling Ori and the Blind Forest. So while abusive employers are certainly an important issue, it doesn't appear to be one that's specific to large companies. Furthermore, it was never going to get solved under the supervision of Bobby Kotick - a man who was never going to leave unless something like the Microsoft deal happened.
There's lots of horrible companies in the world, and I salute anyone's efforts to boycott the ones doing horrible shit. Part of the reason I'm ambivalent about the merger is, I don't even buy (or care about the success of) Activision games. But I don't see that as a topic directly relevant to corporate merging/growth. Two publishers merge, that hasn't added to the amount of employee abuse going on in each of their studios.
All of this in my eyes boils down to how capitalism is the problem and I don't think we solve capitalism with boycotts but with strikes.
New obsidian fallout when?
god i hope not. they would not make it right
for reference, almost nobody that was at obsidian for new vegas is still there, so its not going to be magically good
it'll be a bug filled mess though thats for sure
Meh let the new kids take a crack at it. Not like the old guys from Obsidian are coming back.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
LONDON, Oct 13 (Reuters) - Xbox maker Microsoft (MSFT.O) closed its $69 billion deal for Activision Blizzard (ATVI.O) on Friday, swelling its heft in the video-gaming market with best-selling titles including "Call of Duty" to better compete with industry leader Sony (6758.T).
Britain finally cleared Microsoft's acquisition of Activision earlier in the day after it forced the Xbox owner to sell the streaming rights to address its competition concerns.
But the regulator ripped up its play book by reopening the case after Microsoft agreed to sell the streaming rights to Activision's games to Ubisoft Entertainment (UBIP.PA), with remedies to ensure the terms were enforceable.
Microsoft announced the deal in early 2022, aiming to boost its growth in console, mobile, PC, and cloud gaming to compete with the likes of Tencent as well as PlayStation-owner Sony.
The British government only offered limited support to the CMA, with the Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt saying that while he did not want to undermine its independence, regulators also needed to focus on encouraging investment.
CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell said the regulator had "delivered a clear message to Microsoft that the deal would be blocked unless they comprehensively addressed our concerns and we stuck to our guns on that."
The original article contains 641 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Of course a gaming company sold for 69
Nice.
Nice.
Nice.
Varry nice
This is the best summary I could come up with:
LONDON, Oct 13 (Reuters) - Xbox maker Microsoft (MSFT.O) closed its $69 billion deal for Activision Blizzard (ATVI.O) on Friday, swelling its heft in the video-gaming market with best-selling titles including "Call of Duty" to better compete with industry leader Sony (6758.T).
Britain finally cleared Microsoft's acquisition of Activision earlier in the day after it forced the Xbox owner to sell the streaming rights to address its competition concerns.
But the regulator ripped up its play book by reopening the case after Microsoft agreed to sell the streaming rights to Activision's games to Ubisoft Entertainment (UBIP.PA), with remedies to ensure the terms were enforceable.
Microsoft announced the deal in early 2022, aiming to boost its growth in console, mobile, PC, and cloud gaming to compete with the likes of Tencent as well as PlayStation-owner Sony.
The British government only offered limited support to the CMA, with the Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt saying that while he did not want to undermine its independence, regulators also needed to focus on encouraging investment.
CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell said the regulator had "delivered a clear message to Microsoft that the deal would be blocked unless they comprehensively addressed our concerns and we stuck to our guns on that."
The original article contains 641 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!