this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3494 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: There's a lot of people in the comment section who clearly didn't read the article so let me clarify that no, this is not about Judge Aileen Cannon. Read. The. Damn. Article.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I still can’t believe that all the rural redneck idiots are willing to start a Civil War for a failed corrupt New York City businessman, who represents everything they don’t stand for in the name of creating a fascist dictatorship and stripping away all of your rights so that the rich people can continue to fuck you in the ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is one of the dumbest things about conservatives in the US ...... we're going to start a civil war - for Trump.

I could agree to many political arguments about rebelling against your own government but to say you want to start a civil war to defend a completely morally bankrupt individual that has absolutely no care for you at all has got to be the dumbest thing I've ever had the opportunity to see and hear.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

MAGAs are being swindled and don't know it.

If you tell them they are being swindled, with proof, they won't believe it and take it out on you instead for suggesting it.

They'd rather be ignorant than be proven wrong. This is also why phone/computer scammers keep going after the same people. The victims never want to believe they were duped until it's too late.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”

― Carl Sagan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Humanity has been victim to that for thousands of years in the form of world religions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No there won't.

Alternate headline: local inbreds big mad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree, their numbers, organization, and ammo reserves are not to be dismissed or underestimated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I believe all of those except organization...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They see (largely) in terms of black and white with zero shades of gray. That makes for way less infighting than the Dems. It's their superpower.

It's how they're beating the left so handily.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It has little to do with that, the problem is structural. They're beating the left because the political system is structured in a way that gives overwhelming advantage to the establishment with minority votes.

Their 35% wacko views are treated as equal to the 65% both by the political system and by the media - see manufacturing consent.

Meanwhile the left wing candidates or proposals are always both too left and not left enough - the pincer maneuver.

Take any issue and see how the left view is scrutinized in the mainstream compared to the right: Biden cancelling student debt? Both too left and not left enough. Obamacare? Same. Guns? Same. Pick your poison.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do you think the solution to that kind of situation is then?

I'm not being facetious, I'm actually interested in your thoughts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As an individual and as a group.

  1. Join A Union - if you are on a salary of any level, join a union. Unions are a force for equalisation of power, a proper seat at the negotiating table and a "third space" of discussion of grievances, finding common ground, resolving worries and deciding on action.

  2. Involvement in local politics, local becomes state, becomes national.

  3. Until, public holiday, mandatory, and ranked choice voting is introduced (if ever), after you advocated for as much change as possible, you voted for the best candidate in the primaries, vote for the candidate that has a chance of winning. Not voting or protest voting does worse than fuck all.

  4. Do not give up on set backs. Get involved. Demand better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Actually, I'm kinda doing all of that. One exception: I'm looking into how to CREATE a union. It's a little daunting but I persist.

Excellent advice in general, friend.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, it wouldn't be too difficult to defeat a gullible and unstable army

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"army" is too strong a word here. Maybe armylet?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just what we need... another civil war... bleh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If that happens it'll just be a half assed January 6th thing again. If there was a "real" civil war, both sides of the political divide would be fighing each other more than the actual current government. It would probably just devolve into terrorists blowing each other up all the time in more of a gang warfare type thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yay! We get to rename the drink "Irish Car Bomb" to "MAGA Tantrum". At least something good came out of all this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

MAGA tantrum is a shot of cheap bourbon dropped into a glass of Budweiser

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

PBR...Maga thinks bud tastes like the gays now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

One random guy on Twitter "there will be a civil war!"

Raw Story: "THE REPUBLICANS ARE THREATENING CIVIL WAR!"

I guess "random Twitter account spouts bullshit" isn't as compelling a headline.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Oh wow another lawsuit to follow which is going to lead to absolutely nothing.

Aren't people tired of this theatre yet?