this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

35742 readers
150 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yet it's the sysadmin who gets blamed, not the developer. "How can you tune the database so this doesn't happen?"

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am telling you this because hopefully it will make you feel a little better. Our head of it blames devs for slow queries.

[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Devs who don't understand how SQL or relational databases work write absolute abortions of queries.

9 times out of 10 - yes it is absolutely the devs. I say that as the dev who gets tasked with analysing why these shitty queries from our low budget outsourced labour are so slow

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you are saying you are the expert in unshitifying queries? What is the most common thing that needs to be unshitified?

[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Err, no? At what point did I claim to be an expert?

It doesn't take a genius to realise that serving 100-record chunks of a billion record dataset using limit 100 offset 582760200 is never gonna perform well

Or that converting indexed time columns to strings and doing string comparisons on them makes every query perform an entire table scan, which is obvious if you actually take the time to look at the query plan (spoiler: they don't)

"Why can't the system handle more than 2 queries per second? This database sucks"

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't mean it so serious. I just tried to express that you seem to have experience with it and I am wondering what you have to deal with. I am sorry if it came across negatively.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my 30 years of experience, it is usually the devs.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

As a dev, yes usually. It is certainly the better starting point.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At my job, it's almost always the dev team that is called first for bad DB performance (not always, because sometimes it is the server that's borked).

[–] stewie410@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I'm the sysadmin (and transitioning to DevOps) at work, but the DBs are 100% in control of our two devs (one of which being the head of IT).

Apparently we're going to hire a third Dev, who will moonlight as our DBA -- oh, and for 30K/yr.

I'm sure this will go well.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Infinitely this, biggest pet peeve

[–] RagingToad@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Allergic to Indices? If your database is slow just add more Indices until you have one on every column of every table! :-)

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Hi I need to add some data to the database.

No you fucking don't

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So the guy died and decomposed in 10 minutes and somehow it mysql's fault?

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

10 minutes for a process is essentially infinity

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Very big table, complex operations, much waiting, so yeah.

In this comic, bodily decomposition occurs at a "feels like" pace:-).

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Poor guy got sigkill-ed, but MySQL keeps going with the request