this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
439 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

58800 readers
3885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Does this fall under fair-use part of copyright?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The training argument is probably going to come up dry by the time the court works its way through expert testimony, as the underlying argument for training as infringement is insane.

But where OpenAI is probably in hot water is that torrenting 100k books in the first place runs afoul of existing copyright legislation.

Everyone is debating the training in these suits, but the real meat and potatoes is going to be the initial infringement of obtaining the books, not how they were subsequently used.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone’s a fan of fair use until it’s their work that is transformed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either we make all art a common freely licensed good and pay artists a flat solidarity wage to feed them, or we don't do that and keep it how it is, but having a loophole exception for some AI corporations is not the way to go.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agree

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›