this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
102 points (91.1% liked)

PC Gaming

11090 readers
351 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Ive got 16gb of vram 2k monitor and this tracks pretty accurately. I almost never use over 8gb. The only games that I can break 10gb are games where I can enable a setting (designed for old PCs) where I can load all the textures into vram.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I would agree because 8gb is entry for desktop gaming and most people start at entry level

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

If he'd chosen his words more carefully and said "many" rather than "most" nobody would have a reason to disagree.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I personally think anything over 1080p is a waste of resolution, and I still use a card with 8GB of VRAM.

That being said, lots of other people want a 16GB card, so let them give you money AMD!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I personally think anything over 1080p is a waste of resolution

But but Nvidia said at the RTX 3000 announcement that we can now have 8K gaming

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›