this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
212 points (97.3% liked)

Programming

17270 readers
39 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love simple sites, but I feel that there's something to be said for design philosophy vs tooling.

Take vanilla WordPress for example. I find it relatively easy to manage static content, especially when running it in a container to categorically prevent dependency concerns. Is it overkill for a simple site? Perhaps, but does it work and is it easy to use? It's possible to use these tools to manage a mostly static, text based, minimal to no script website. The key is recognizing the value of that simplicity and providing that simple to read, simple to use experience without distractions.

WordPress will never be as simple and performant as a truly static site, but we can do a lot to cut down the cognitive load, and we should.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›