I'm trying to finally switch from Windows to Linux, meanwhile this mf is already trying out alternatives to Linux. That's when you know you're late to the game.
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54462 readers
290 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yep, installed my first Linus Distro in primary school at about 11 yo. Now I am 23.
In all seriousness while I think FreeBSD and GhostBSD are very cool, and have some interesting server applications they do have some annoying limitations. It's not really their fault either, it sucks being the 4th most common platform/kernel/whatever. The FreeBSD people seem less uptight about working with proprietary software as it's not the same kind of Open Source Linux is because it's not copyleft. So you can use their code wherever even in closed source products. They include things like Nvidia drivers straight in their repos.
As for what makes them different/interesting: Linux is very capable but also kind of over engineered, confusing, and somewhat jank. BSDs are generally more simple. You would think this makes them less capable but aside from software support they often have more useful features. BSDs had Jails before Containers where supported properly on Linux.
BSD is almost what Linux is to Windows: faster, more stable, less annoying, and with a fraction of the users, hardware and software support. It's also a bit more complex to do certain things out of the box - though GhostBSD does give you a GUI and decent installer.
Also BTRFS on Linux feels like this:
Child: "Can we have ZFS?"
Mother: "We have ZFS at home."
ZFS at home: BTRFS
Like it's good that it exists, a lot better than other OSes had for a while, but it just doesn't compare to the stability and performance of the original. There are some areas where it's a bit more flexible and that can be useful, but generally it's just not as good. Pretty much Linux, then Apple, then Microsoft all tried copying ZFS, only worse. Heck it actually came from Sun Microsystems, then got Open Sourced allowing the FreeBSD people among others to port it to their system. Linux now has BCacheFS which might be even better but it's too early to tell.
Sorry for the long response. Thought I would explain some stuff while I am here.
No worries, 'twas a very interesting read!
Glad you enjoyed. I would give one of the BSDs a go. NomadBSD is a good option to try out as it's designed as a persistent live system that runs from a USB drive. Let me know if you have any questions, though I am far from an expert on this yet.
There are some BSDers that unironically consider Linux too mainstream.
You can add lidarr to your stack. Its not that good like radarr/sonarr imo
try Qobuz. They dont have that hardcore drm afail
You can try YT music via piped.
Gonic / jellyfin / subsonic for streaming your local cd rips
Or ~~pirated stuff~~ other legally aquired media
Real pirates wouldn't care because they would have downloaded everything they want to listen to anyway /s
Jokes aside, is mpd not supported? These days I don't even want to go to Spotify with how good YT Music is with my recommendations. I just download something if I listened to it more than three times.
I can personally vouch for Qobuz as they usually have the music I'm looking for. Deezer is also a really popular option. Idk if they have all that drm stuff or not. Ofc YT music exists, but they don't have lossless audio
load more comments
(1 replies)
I use Jellyfin to stream my music library (which is over 20 GiB) everywhere.
Also, there is this unofficial way to install Jellyfin on BSD.
Edit – I am willing to give you temporary access to my public server, if you want to try it out.
I tried that method. It's seriously borked if you ever want transcoding to work. Jellyfin has a customized version of ffmpeg they used that just dosen't exist on FreeBSD to the best of my knowledge. You can maybe make it work with the FreeBSD version but it would be an ugly hack.
If music available on YouTube is enough, you can use, or host your own Beatbump server. beatbump.io is a what I use occasionally.
"BSDs" are not a monolith. You should actually specify what the hell it is you are talking about. Spotify runs just fine under the Linux ABI on FreeBSD.
Hi, I am currently on GhostBSD but that could change so I didn't want to be too specific in the post. I have tried installing spotify the way you suggest and it just crashes before I can get to a login screen. Do you think there is a way to make it work?
I do not use GhostBSD and am not familiar with it. It can be done on vanilla FreeBSD, you need to bootstrap an Ubuntu base system which is somewhat involved since there is not a package for it. Google is your friend.
I already have an Ubuntu system bootstrapped. It doesn't work. I think I messed it up somehow. Do you have a specific guide?
https://www.micski.dk/2022/01/19/how-to-install-spotify-on-freebsd/ https://www.micski.dk/2021/12/21/install-ubuntu-base-system-into-freebsds-linux-binary-compatibility/
If it is crashing, you should probably figure out why. man ktrace man lldb. Linux coredumps are supported now, too.
Those steps are outdated. I specifically had to lookup spotify's directions for installing on Ubuntu as the public key has changed I think. It's also just sort of freezes, it doesn't close or anything. There is a message about the GPU drivers I don't really understand and probably can't fix as that's a kernel issue.
Spotify is just an electron app. You can disable any GPU access just like you can with chrome via a flag.
My point is, unless spotify is trying to call a heretofore unimplemented syscall, it can be made to run. The linuxulator is basically as good as native.
Yeah tbh I made a mess of the Linux environment. I am gonna reinstall and see what happens. There are other potentially GPU related things going on on this system though so IDK. Like I could disable it for that one application but that wouldn't fix the other issues if that makes sense.
The Linuxulator is cool but I kind of don't trust it. Maybe I will try Linux containers.
My advice is to ditch GhostBSD, you are basically putting yourself further into the corner than you already are by trying to use FreeBSD on the desktop.
Linux binaries run just by a syscall shim. There's not much to trust or distrust. If all the syscalls are implemented and mapped to native FreeBSD syscalls, the thing works. Otherwise, it doesn't.
Oh I am sure the kernel support is great. I am more having issues working with chroots directly. I am much more at home managing docker and lxc which are more isolated. I just broke something trying to remove a couple chroots while stuff was still mounted - I think I nuked /home. You don't really have that issue with docker containers or lxc, it's a simple command to remove.
More isolated in which way? You should probably read up on how all this stuff is actually implemented, it will clarify your understanding of what is going on rather than just throwing commands at the wall and seeing what sticks.
I mean docker and especially lxc do a lot more than just chroot. They use cgroups, namespaces, and other stuff that's beyond my paygrade. LXC remaps user IDs for example. That's without getting into tech like gvisor and runsc that further isolates them by restricting system calls and re implementing some of them to increase security. Obviously there are things like privileged containers which have fewer restrictions, but those are the exception not the rule. From what I understand of chroot it only really restricts what files it can see; there is a reason why android supports chroots + termux but not a full docker install. Chroots to me are mainly used for bootstrapping systems and recovering systems. They aren't meant for real virtualization or server work by themselves if you catch my drift.
I know how docker and lxc work and the difference between them and chroots. But you're talking about persistence of changes breaking things. You are right that chroot only operates on the VFS namespace. Jails are the kind of isolation you are after, and in fact were in FreeBSD before containerization was even a word.
Things like remapping user IDs start to pervert the line between userspace and what the kernel gives a shit about. Linux containerization technologies are many things, but elegant they are not.
You can run a Linux Jail/Container in FreeNAS, right?
I am aware jails exist, I had bastille installed before I bricked my system to play with.
The same as you can in regular FreeBSD, under a bhyve VM running Linux. You can also use the linux ABI in a jail.
load more comments
(27 replies)
view more: next ›