this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
100 points (79.8% liked)

Technology

34971 readers
171 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your lying, this is the first result

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Update 9/21/2023: Google says it has removed the AI-generated selfie from Knowledge Graph and Knowledge Panels, where it was appearing, after 404 Media reached out for comment and first published this story.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok. Fair enough. I don't hold anything against 404 media. But OP should have checked that information before posting. Especially since it is very easy to see that's not the case currently. The title implies currently it is that photo. It is not

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OP shouldn't have changed the title from the original in the article.

OP should have just posted the article.

Regardless, it's a very direct way of rewriting history someone was attempting. It's good it got caught and called out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OP's title isn't significantly different from the original.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta protect the people(THAT I DON'T KNOW) that can't even click the link but tried to validate the article by searching in the google, right?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

?????? Woke up on the wrong side the bed?

[–] ink 6 points 1 year ago

why does it seem like a fake attempt at clickbait

  • make a fake story with a controversial topic, no one else can verify

  • mark it fixed a day later

  • profit

"Google's first result shows Trump won the 2020 election"

in the article:

update: Google has removed the content

Easy traffic

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Search results are usually unique to each user. If you can't be fingerprinted by Google (rare, you'll get a CAPTCHA if so), then it will be unique to your geography.

So there's no way you can verify their claim that it was the first result.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

No it is not

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Lmao, me gusta