this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
534 points (97.0% liked)

politics

22674 readers
3677 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) warned of uncertainty over Trump’s sweeping new tariffs, saying, “In the long run, we’re all dead,” and slammed blind loyalty to the policy.

While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers—unlike four GOP senators—he criticized the lack of clarity on economic impacts.

Trump imposed a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, falsely claiming foreign nations will bear the cost.

Kennedy told Newsmax that predictions on the tariffs’ effects are unreliable, adding anyone claiming certainty is “lying” or “selling deep stupid.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.)is all about blind loyalty.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only these Republicans "speaking out" against Trump decimating the economy were members of some kind of political body with the power to stop this executive overreach...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

The problem is their aren’t enough of them willing to speak up so the few that might don’t wish to lose their power, so they remain quiet convincing themselves they are doing the right thing by “living to fight another day”.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

John Kennedy should be drinking Night Train Express from a paperbag behind the Circle K. He's helped assure that the billionaires will eventually become trillionaires once they vulture all the tanked stocks. He'll be rewarded for it, don't you worry your pretty head about his "concerns".

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago

I was fine with the rape and the fraud and the endless lies and the misogyny and the racism and the homophobia and the transphobia and the corruption and the police brutality and the caged babies and the disappearing of citizens and the terrorism and the attempted coup and the autocracy and the ending the rule of law and the threats to invade neighboring countries and the building-a-golf-resort-on-top-of-a-genocide, but now he's giving Wall Street the jitters, so I'm not so sure about this guy any more.

credit to https://mstdn.social/@Nickiquote/114275545356485888

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He's pulling a McConnell (blocked impeachment consequences both times), have all the power to prevent it and do nothing, then complain when shit happens because of you to try to shift the blame.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Dam maybe they should stop voting for it and enabling it.

It's like they want to support a fascist coup and not be executed when it goes wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't happen to a more deserving pack of rodents.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

don't hate on rodents

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'We're All Dead'

Okay well hurry up about it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Tired of false promises, man.

[–] [email protected] 248 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"idiot votes for thing he is absolutely against"

like all conservatives, they lack the will or ability to think or act like autonomous human beings.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago

He's a fucking liar.

If he voted for it, he isn't against it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The political system is inherently set up for politicians to compromise for their self-interest — because money. For personal profit and/or to get re-elected. There was a decent New Yorker article I read on the matter a few years ago that suggested something along the lines that, even if a politician begins their career with the best intentions, the process of getting elected for higher and higher offices erodes those intentions. That's even if they had any decent intentions to begin with, of course.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

That's what would happen if something like Career Politicians were allowed to take over the system...

Oh wait... That happened decades ago... 🤦‍♀️ 🙄

🤡 🖕 🖕

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 184 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers

Shut the fuck up then, Senator. Your vote matters. Your comments don't.

One more dinosaur who thinks people should give a fuck about things other than his actual actions. Pure distraction.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

News that I was forced to listen to in the break room at work said that the tariffs will be good for America and long as the country don't put retaliatory tariffs that they just lay down and take them then Trump won't add more. Seriously tired of our media bending the knee for trump and lying to thier listeners.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Nope Channel 6 news in Tulsa.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

forced to listen to in the break room at work

What "news" was this, if you don't mind me asking?

Totally agree that US media is a shell of what used to be journalism. Profits control all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our local channel 6 news. They're right wing news.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably a Sinclair owned station. Their as bad or worse than Fox because their stealthier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Nope locally owned. They love letting us know that. Just owmed by Trump loving people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago

wasn’t concerned enough about President Donald Trump's steep international tariffs to vote against them Wednesday

Then shut the fuck up and enjoy your vote.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

shouldve convicted him the first 2 times he was impeached, but mitch mcconell has his money and left you all to your fate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

These idiots passed the CR, and knew it was going to happen lmao tf? is this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah but red colour go brrr4r

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What a misleading headline. The full quote from the article is:

“In the long run, we’re all dead,” he told CNN’s Manu Raju on Capitol Hill for “The Lead with Jake Tapper” on Wednesday. “Short run matters, too. Nobody knows what the impact of these tariffs is going to be on the economy.”

So he's not saying "we're all dead [as a result of this action]" he's just giving a shitty excuse for making foolish decisions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly. It seems people really need it spelled out to them: he's saying protectionism works in the long term but they're old and will all be dead(a keynes quote "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead"). He's wrong though. Protectionism, which are essentially self sanctions, can develop an industry as much as not. Nothing's a vacuum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What has to happend to cancel a political party? Like, officially?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The People string up the leaders from the street, historically.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The People put the leaders to the guillotine, historically.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The short drop will do just fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

In the long run, we’re all dead

Yeah, that's the plan. But you guys could have predicted that because we all did.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

There was that no kings act bill. Why not dig that back up?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Oh, wouldn't that be nice.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Any military workers/veterans in here? When are you gonna uphold your sworn oath to the constitution?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

If they haven't by now, and they haven't, they aren't going to.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

I've been screaming my head off against that asshole for ten years, and I can't rally democrats to do anything more than play tambourine and sing kumbaya.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“I mean, granted, I did absolutely no homework about tariffs, nor did I take what basically amounted to all of the economists warnings in consideration, but doggone it, I really thought this con-artist was on to something - and to that, I can’t help but feel a little misled. Is it really my responsibility to make the best decisions for my constituents? Accountability is for suckers and leaders.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the long run, we’re all dead

Isn't Foghorn Leghorn quoting Keynes here? Why, I thought Keynes [1] was right up there with Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky [2] in the pantheon of Bad Guys the cons don't know a fucking thing about but constantly talk about.

[1] I'm still convinced a lot of racist dumbfucks thought that Keynesian had something to do with Kenyan, because Obama is Blah.

[2] I remember in the height of qons talking about "Alinsky style politics" I'd ask them to explain what they mean by that? Also, have they read Rules for Radicals? If so, what is so bad in there? What is the book about? I also asked them if the mere use of satire is "Alinsky style politics" does that mean Mark Twain had a time machine and he traveled into the future to get tips from Alinsky or something? Hilarity would ensue...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Oh cheer up republicans! In 60 years there'll be more idiots who might vote for you. Unless they ever ask any old person why they're homeless.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Senator Kennedy can go fuck himself for enabling Trump for the last decade. I’m glad he can see the disaster that’s going to swallow him and his colleagues coming.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

"How dare they do this horrible thing that I voted for!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

…. While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers-

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

John Kennedy is a shrewd little rat fuck piece of shit. Highly educated, despite his carefully curated backwater shit kicker persona. I dare say he’s a canary in the coal mine.

load more comments
view more: next ›