this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
819 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

68867 readers
23 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 206 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

No matter how much I hate Mozilla's new path, companies like this challenging big tech are bold and have a lot of courage. If I set aside my personal op opinions about Mozilla, I actually admire them for this. They can actually dent big tech with funding from big tech itself.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I keep hearing a lot of negative comments about Mozilla lately. I’m wondering if this move is more in line with then just turning into another google rather than disrupting the marketplace.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For now, they're better than Google. I have some bad opinions about them, but anything better than Google competing with Google is an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah it’s not even close.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

...and then join the big tech at some point.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

If this works out it might be a nice place to migrate to away from my self-hosted e-mail provided they eventually let you bring your own domain. Just sucks that e-mail is essentially the most secure thing you need to have since compromising that can compromise every account attached to the e-mail. That’s a lot of trust you need to instill in your e-mail host.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have fond memories of self-hosting a qmail setup for a long time, then eventually migrating to a postfix configuration, back in the day.

Keeping up with spam filtering finally did me in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I think it's incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

I'm not saying I know the answer- What I'm saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it's not even considerable.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It's funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You can't know that with absolute certainty. Sorry, but if you're using someone elses server for your communications and they're not end to end encrypted, you should just assume that they can and do read your emails, and act accordingly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was thinking ab this being april fool bcz it's posted on 1st...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Thunderbird Pro will apparently be:

This email thing plus Thunderbird Send (which is basically https://send.vis.ee/), Thunderbird Appointment - a scheduling tool and Thunderbird Assist, which is:

"...at least for now, being cautiously labeled as “an experiment” that will allow users to take advantage of AI features within their email. However, the goal is to be lightweight enough that the language models can be run locally on a user’s PC in the interest of privacy. This service is being developed in partnership with Flower AI, which leverages Nvidia’s confidential compute to provide private remote processing in the event a user’s PC isn’t powerful enough. Sipes emphasizes that any remote processing features attached to Thunderbird Assist will always be optional, in the interest of ensuring complete user privacy."

So AI shit that nobody asked for or wants.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This covers my thoughts about damn near every "helpful" feature this side of auto-complete email addresses.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They said it will be opt-in and are trying to make it local-first. Their provider(?) apparently allows fallback to nvidia cloud compute when the hardware can't handle it.

I'm not using AI to write my fucking emails, regardless. Just wanted to let people know.

p.s. Sorry, I'm dumb, skipped over quote in parent comment. Point is, there's more to the service than optional AI bullshit, and you shouldn't have to disable it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Out of all the articles and the official release announcement, you could share, you shared forbes which violate people privacy.

Why?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I hope to god one day the developers at Mozilla finally get tired of this shit and fork everything under a new org.

Fuck off with more services and give me my integrated FTP client back. No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

lol @ ftp client

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Here's what I want.... I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don't want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

if it's anything like gmail, they'd offer imap so you can set it up in thunderbird and download your messages locally.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Syncthing still works like that. It’s completely self hostable. I have it on a pi 1B+ lol

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I have a 20ish year old history in my Gmail account organized in labels and all that. I wonder if it will be viable to migrate?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Considering labels are very non-standard, which caused trouble over IMAP since forever, I wouldn't count on that part.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

welp I signed up for the waitlist.

I'll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I'll move my main shit off to it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm listening...

But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

If its not zero access its just more ameritech bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Doesn't like 90% of Mozilla's funding come from Google? At least expanding their paid services could be seen as trying to turn that around.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The anti-monopoly lawsuit against Google fixed that

https://fortune.com/2024/08/05/mozilla-firefox-biggest-potential-loser-google-antitrust-search-ruling/

Now Mozilla has to find a way to offset that loss, which would be attracting the non-Firefox market

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From my understanding thunbird is somewhat separated from this. From the article linked by OP it says:

What’s crystal clear is that Thunderbird’s ever-increasing donation revenue (currently its sole source of income) is allowing for some explosive growth that’s long overdue. To add some context to this, Thunderbird received $2.8 million in donation revenue during 2021. Two years later, in 2023, it received $8.6 million in donations. I’m told that total financial contributions for 2024 were even higher, though the final amount hasn’t been officially released.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Err... does this mean we can get a Mozilla or Thunderbird email address?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Yes, sort of. Thundermail addresses, apparently, or bring your own. From the linked article you're commenting on:

Users can send and receive email using new Thundermail accounts they sign up for. The service will also allow using your own custom domain (e.g. [email protected]).

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›