I want my browser just to render websites, but it's so difficult these days.
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37690 readers
316 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I’m about 99% sure that this is exactly what credit card companies do.
There’s another comment here about banks scrapping your history. Guess I’ll ask because now I’m curious. What’s a realistic way to get around this type of thing with banks and credit cards short of using cash? I hate cash :(
None.
Even if your bank doesn't do it, the credit card processor will. They will be very careful to "anonymize" the data up to a legally plausible deniability level, just like Google does, before selling it, but that's about it. Even if you use multiple banks with multiple credit cards with different card processors, someone purchasing enough of the "anonymized" data would be able to correlate some of it.
If you don't want (almost) any data to be scraped, it's either cash or Monero.
However... if you have no credit history, don't expect to get any loans, so you might want to build a history of being a ~~reliable fool~~ good client.
Probably a local credit union, provided it's FDIC insured and has decent terms of membership. Most credit unions aren't in the business of spying on the people that own them, their purpose is just to manage their clients' money and facilitate spending.
That's just one out of many chrome settings to keep track of. It's just easier to change browser and pick one that provide decent privacy by default. See Firefox, Brave, Tor Browser.
Honestly this is better than the old suit, but I still don't want it.
What I would like: this is a webpage about cars, maybe the ads should be relevant to the content, instead of images of disgusting toenails that say "your doctor will eat your baby if you don't read this"
I honestly wonder if the advertising industry is just a house of cards, with everyone so far up their own asses that they couldn’t possibly realize how much energy, resources, and dignity is just getting wasted.
I can’t help but feel sorry for whoever thought their “targeted advertising” worked when I just accidentally picked up my tablet and clumsily landed a finger on a banner, or let an entire video ad play because I was preoccupied and not physically able to skip it. The only ads I genuinely pay attention to are the promotional newsletters I actually sign up for out of legitimate interest from those sites, not out of pride or anything, it’s just the only instance where actually find myself interested in what’s being advertised. Everything else out there in the “targeted” web is just white noise to me, and people think it’s a gold mine.
I buy a washing machine after a 20 minute search and going to a click and collect website to place an order with a local big brand store.
For the next 6 months:
"HEY CHECK OUT THESE WASHING MACHINES LOOK AT THESE REVIEWS WASHING MACHINES ON SPECIAL CLIIIICK MEEEEEE"
I'd expect that the advertisement is relevant to the content of the page. But I don't know, as I haven't seen a single bit of advertisement for the last 15 years.
I haven’t seen a single bit of advertisement for the last 15 years.
Same...weird how most people don't know about ad blocking strategies.
People don't realize how bad things are until they experience them differently.
maybe the ads should be relevant to the content
Back in the old days, that used to be how it worked... but soon ad networks learned that showing ads "relevant to the user" had better click-through rates than showing ads "relevant to the content", with the content becoming only a data point to classify the user for the best ads that might sway them.
Soon after, advertisers caught on the trend, started blindly paying for ads targeted at user profiles, then ad networks stopped showing stats about whether content-targeted or user-targeted ads were getting better conversion rates, and everyone has been coasting on blind faith in "the algorithm" ever since.
100%. And If I’m watching a YouTube video on computers and technology, I don’t need ads for tampons and car insurance.
There's a similar "feature" in Android that replaced the old Android ad ID. Android rolling out new Ad privacy settings
my pixel is so much nicer to use now that i put calyx os
FYI, banks do run exactly this type of analysis inside their own system to get around not being able to share your account activity.