this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
354 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
3878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I imagine we will be saying goodbye to many such things soon, in the extreme maybe yhe entire idea of a global internet and many open projects like Wikipedia, I can't see how they can coexist with our world now without being shut down or subverted into evil, might as well go out on their own terms.

I do hope a copy exists somewhere, perhaps waiting for a brighter day. Maybe that's naive, but maybe truth and knowledge will become a desirable thing again one day.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The evil Wikipedia already exists, it's called Metapedia

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For anyone who doesn’t know (as I didn’t), metapedia is pretty clear Nazi apologist crap, just to save you checking/ending up on a watchlist.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

But is it a good list or a bad list these days. I’m confused. /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Yikes. Thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Eh it's not really the same thing, there's plenty of these sorts of things like rationalwiki and prolewiki and whatnot. I meant the Wikipedia itself

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can download Wikipedia.

Anyone can actually.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't have the storage capacity required personally

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The compressed text only dump is about 25gb.

It only grows to many terabytes if you include all revisions and media files

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, TIL. Downloading now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

Then feed it into an AI or something.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, I'm not sure how I feel about preemptively burning your own books, willingly diving back into the stone age for no good reason. Most of the fears outlined in the article are pure speculation and over-reaction to current events. If data from 23 and Me (the source of most of this data being burned) is really getting out there to be purchased, this hiding of data and data destruction does not even inconvenience bad state actors, it only puts up a big bad-actor sourced pay wall in front of legitimate scientists. This is really a shameful cowardice at best, anti-science either way, and at worst they may be actually selling the data to someone and then deleting the public database behind a big flourish with smoke and mirrors. (Reading back my post to myself I guess I am sure how I feel about preemptively burning your own books. It makes me mad apparently. )