this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
398 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22634 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump stated the U.S. will "go as far as we have to go" to gain control of Greenland, citing national and international security needs.

JD Vance will visit Greenland’s Pituffik military base, scaling back a broader visit amid backlash from Greenland and Denmark.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Mute Egede condemned the move as "aggressive pressure" and insisted that "Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders."

Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, asserting that U.S. control is essential for security.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Fucking believe him. Take it as the threat that it is. Prepare immediately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is he actually threatening another NATO member with military action?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He doesn’t have to. He’ll first let the US leave NATO.. and then attack Greenland.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully. If the US leaves NATO and then attacks, article 5 can be triggered.

If they attack before leaving NATO I don't believe article 5 can be used.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish this man would finally do something beneficial for the world and just die already... preferably of a cheeseburger related causation (heart attack, stroke, or choke).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I hope we find out that he drowned in his own pony jar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wasn't that the jar that shattered up some guy's ass?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

god i was so happy when i heard he got shot and then he had to ruin it by surviving.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Luigi 2 when

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

NATO countries should put out a statement that they are ready to defend Greenland from any incursion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the rest of the g20 countries should immediately financially sanction the us and every us politician along with the us dollar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It would be more effective to threaten sanctions if the US proceeds if the goal is it to deter them, then if it doesn't work, you impose them as punishment and a bargaining chip to get them to pull back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No need. That's what articles 4 and 5 are for.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Everyone knows that. The point is to create a deterrent by making it clear that they are 1) taking the threat seriously and 2) already preparing and planning to defend, IOW not fucking around. Sending some extra troops to the island and/or flying some jets around the area on a regular isn't a bad idea either.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Just a little imperialism we promise 🥸

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe he'll take a trade, offer him Greenland for Hawaii, see if he takes it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

He would because that gives the US/Russia alliance a much better play at Europe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Just do it, okay? I'm so fucking tired of hearing this bullshit everyday. Just do it and get it fucking done with , you fucking imbecile.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Careful...careful what you wish for.. we don't want to do that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Accelerationism hasn’t proven to be an effective method of dealing with him so far. There’s no reason to believe that pattern would change because of this.

load more comments
view more: next ›