this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
162 points (97.6% liked)

politics

22503 readers
3473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Three out of four Americans — including 60% of Republicans — say the Trump administration's use of a Signal group chat to discuss military strikes is a serious problem, according to the first poll out on the national security breach.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For now.

They used to think January 6 was bad too.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When George Floyd was murdered, they spent fifteen minutes thinking it was bad, until action was requested. Then he suddenly deserved it and always deserved it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Of course it's bad. We want bad."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

When it's not working, it's working.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep.

Doesn't matter though.

In their minds not voting "R" is the worst possible thing that could happen in existence. Trump could individually rape and murder all their children and they'd still show up and vote "R" because the alternative is somehow worse. They can't explain how it's worse, but it is, somehow.

Conservatives can express discontent, or even outrage, toward their representatives, but they have ZERO interest in holding their own accountable.

Because it's a cult.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

HitlerPig might rape and murder their children, but they think the Dems would rape and murder their children, and then eat them. So Republicans are better.

Or maybe, y'know, don't elect rapists/murderous/cannibals of any kind.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is it serious enough to take actual, decisive action to hold anyone in the Trump administration accountable?

"Oh, no no no. Now let's not get too crazy here. All we want to do is hold hearings so we can decide how to blame Signal for all of this and maybe get a couple of unrelated brown people deported. Nobody's talking crazy talk like holding Trump accountable or anything."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"After a comprehensive investigation, we have decided that justice would be best served by executing the reporter for doing his job. Problem solved. Send money. Or else."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

-gate is the suffix for scandals.

-a-Lago is the suffix for stupid scandals.

This one should be called Sig-na-Lago.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I knew it was bad when the general consensus on the sycophantic subreddit r/conservative also held the opinion that these people should be held accountable. How terrible do you have to be to piss off your own loyalists? This timeline does not even feel real sometimes

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The conservatives themselves lag behind on real news. It takes a few days for their leaders to unite around their own narrative and to change the cycle. Just wait, the peons will start agreeing that it’s fake news shortly. Just like Russian interference and the perfect Ukraine call.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It was a perfect phone call!

I never understood how they didn’t balk at that statement. It’s utter drivel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Same as the one he had with the GA elections head guy, asking due another 10k or so votes. ‘Perfect calls’.

The interesting thing is that the immediate conservative response is the truth! They admit it before their fearless leaders lie and redirect. Russia WAS the enemy. We WERE at war with Eurasia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

"And you can’t let it happen, and you are letting it happen," Trump said. "You know, I mean, I’m notifying you that you’re letting it happen. So, look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state."

It was a VERY specific number. Oddly exact. So precise he absolutely could not have been asking for an honest double check of the results.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Here is what he means when he says it was a "Perfect Call":

His political mentor, and all around legendary shithead and mobster lawyer Roy Cohn (also Roger Stone's mentor), taught HitlerPig to use weasely language to be able to claim innocence and/or plausible deniablility. It's what Michael Cohen referred to as "The Code:"

“He doesn’t give you questions, he doesn’t give you orders,” Cohen said. “He speaks in a code, and I understand the code because I’ve been around him for a decade.”

One part of it is to speak of himself in the third person, using the "Royal We." On his infamous "Perfect Phone Call" with Zelensky, he told Z that aid was coming, but first, he wanted Z to "do US a favor," and went on to demand that Ukraine launch a phony investigation against the Bidens before releasing the aid.

By using "Us" instead "Me," he believed that he couldn't be accused of a personal quid pro quo, and could argue that he was making a request on behalf of the American people, and not just himself, even though the demand only helps himself, and not America in any way.

That's why he was so frustrated when nobody would pay attention to his choice of pronouns, constantly screeching about his "PERFECT phone call." It was perfect because he thought it contained a undeniable loophole that would definitely hold up in court, and have the judge say "Ooh, you brilliant scamp, you skated free again with your incredible command of the English language. You got me, hats off to you, sir! CASE DISMISSED! (can I get a picture with you?)"

He was frustrated because it isn't the 50s/60s, when judges were happy to help out any rich white guy. All they needed was the tiniest shred of an excuse, and using different pronouns was good enough. Today, judges aren't going to accept such obvious machinations as a defense, and that pissed off HitlerPig, who was counting on his Rich/White privilege to get his case dismissed.

Even his allies didn't try to defend him on that point, because everybody saw how ignorant that defense is, and nobody wanted to be the guy to say "He said Us, not We, so he's off the hook," because they knew they'd get excoriated in the media for saying something that stupid.

I can't think of any examples right now, but after having that revelation, I've seen him refer to other situations as "perfect," and they all include some variation on that same strategy of being vague enough that he THINKS he can claim plausible deniability. Pay attention, and you'll learn to spot his "Mobster Language."

Edit: NJSpradlin reminded me of his "Perfect Phone Call" with the Georgia election officials. Same deal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

That's just the initial knee jerk reaction (based on their actual personal beliefs) before the Conservative Propaganda Machine tells them what to believe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Eh.

They can SAY it's unacceptable and someone should be held accountable.

But they won't hold anyone with an "R" next to their name accountable at the polls. Or in any other significant way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They won't do anything about it so why even listen to them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Gotta keep the liberal echo chamber at full blast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Group membership matters to all of us. It's like one of the primary drivers of belief. We might think we're rational and cool logical people but that's a lie. We trust people we see as being in-group, and we trust facts from them.

For some people, like many republicans, it's also the only thing that really matters.

This may have been a viable strategy in like 3000BCE when you had to stick with your group of idiots, because otherwise you'd be left for dead or worse by the enemy tribe. It's not really a solid strategy in 2025CE.

But that's really the whole problem. People (often but not always republicans) put their group membership ahead of everything else. This is happening like deep in the emotional part of their psyche. There's no easy fix. You'd probably have to get them to join some other group and see that as primary, like maybe appeal to their sense of being American, but it's going to be hard when there's a lot of them. It's like gravity, they all pull each other into the group.

I don't know how to fix this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Cult deprogramming