this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
726 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

15570 readers
324 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A controversial proposal from U.S Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to let bird flu naturally spread through poultry farms is raising alarms among scientists -- who say the move could be inhumane and dangerous.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Do you want plague chickens? Because this how you get plague chickens.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let him visit one of these farms for a good few days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

From what I know it's mostly the trucks transporting between farms. They're not being cleaned frequently enough or well enough. Though, there is I think some cases of it being transmitted in migrating wildlife.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You go first Mr RFK Jr

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Well, there it is. Life will... find a way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

“The way we raise birds now, there’s not a lot of genetic variability,” Hansen said. “They’re all the same bird, basically.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

What is the stance of the department of agriculture on the bird flu?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›