USA has always been corrupt. What's chocking is the brazenness of this administration. Former administrations at least had the decency to do it in the shadows.
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
682 points (99.4% liked)
politics
21970 readers
4251 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Satellite internet is simply never going to best the throughput and stability of fiber. Just another corrupt action so this administration can line their pockets.
I think the bigger headline should be the huge conflict of interest between Musk being a megadonor and "advisor" / leader of DOGE (depending on if you ask Trump or his minions) and being the CEO of Starlink owner SpaceX.
Add it to the list including lease of Starlink services and kits to the FAA.
In a just world they would be publicly executed for blatantly grifting 300million+ people.
It's called crony capitalism
It's called Late Stage Capitalism, converting and eating itself into fascism.
Since citizens united, the notion of this type of conflict of interest is a theoretical talking point
load more comments
(2 replies)
Wow I’m shocked. This is my shocked face.
There is absolutely no reason the US government shouldn't be launching their own public satellite internet.
Look at North Korea. People get killed for smuggling in flash drives with western media into the country. We could be streaming it from uninterruptible satellites. We could be fighting the global information war on a level most other countries could only dream of.
On the domestic end, if we get Internet access to every corner of the country, it opens up remote work to every American. That could bring an incredible economic boost to impoverished rural areas.
We are losing the information war at home. Why would we wish our terrible misinformation on anyone else? They’d turn this into a news max global broadcast system.
Trump shut down Radio Free Asia. And Radio Free Europe, and Voice of America. I don't think he cares about getting the message out there.
And as far as a public Internet? Have you met the US? We can't deliver electricity or water without someone making a profit on each unit of energy or water delivered. It's unamerican. Why would satellite Internet be any different?
Yeah amigo, I get that'd be amazing but you think the government would want highly educated populace here and everywhere? and with free access to all kinds of information?
Yeah right...
Sadly, I think it's been established that access to the internet doesn't make people more educated.
I would much rather see Europe doing it.
As someone that lives in the rural US and has no option for internet besides Starlink, I'd much rather have fiber. Starlink isn't bad, but it's garbage compared to fiber.
Plus I don't want to give Elmo my money. I really wish I had other options.
Connect yourselves. Telecom Cooperatives have a long and successful history in developing rural telecommunications
My grandmother’s rural electric coop laid down fiber to most homes they service to. She has faster Internet than me in town.
You’re lucky you get any channels besides Fox News. Keep complaining and you’ll go back to dialup ;) ;) ;)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Fiber is amazing. I paid $90 for 400 down and 10 up on cable... Then moved to a place with fiber. My fiber is now $49 for 1,000 down and 1,000 up.
in the west coast sonic can provide up to 10gbits. for 40$ starting price. catch is the COL is somewhat expensive. for the longest time xfinity was the only choice, and we have known thier constantly changing the tiers of the services to charge people more.
And it totally won't be monitored or censored ... promise! /s
probably the point of putting it in the white house, so russia can monitor it.
ATTENTION ~~CITIZEN~~ ILLEGAL ALIEN:
Connection to [lemmy.dbzer0.com] has been [BLOCKED] due to [RADICAL ANARCHIST TERRORIST ACTIVITY]. US-SchutzStaffel Agents have been dispatched to your location.
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE. HAIL TESLA!
Starlink makes sense on the top of mountain. If you have electricity from the grid, you should get fiber.
load more comments
(9 replies)
It sucks to even be in partial agreement with the broligarchs, but as a rural American, I have zero sympathy for this fuckhead or anyone else involved in the broadband fund.
The government has been pouring money into broadband expansion for decades, and for decades, internet providers have been sopping up that money while doing exactly nothing to actually earn it.
in rural areas they dont have much choices, but in the west we have non-atat,xfinity, TWC, and verizon at least.
I mean, we could tell them to pay back the money, or force them to make upgrades. But, its easier to just award contracts to starlink.
We certainly can't make them pay the money back. That could affect executive bonuses and stock plans as well corporate stock buybacks to drive up stock prices! Won't you think of the executives! ^/s^
Yeah there aren't any good guys to root for here.
There is absolutely a far lesser of two evils here, though.
Comcast sucks, but they’re not actively dismantling our institutions.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Wouldn't 4G make more sense for most rural locations, its not like its a single house with nothing for 1000 miles in all directions
To the users yes, or coax(DOCSIS), how they get to the Internet doesn't really matter, the challenge for rural communities is how they connect to the urban networks(backhaul).
A lot of rural towns are actually serviced by wireless point to point radios. They have some impressive throughput capabilities but nowhere near what fiber can provide. Also, they are affected by environmental factors like weather or wildlife (https://youtu.be/cZkAP-CQlhA)
ISPs don't really want to spend millions of dollars to run fiber through mountains to service a town of 4 or 5 thousand people, it would be a poor investment, this is where government programs like above can be useful in then allowing that town or region to have better Internet.
They can probably make the argument that starlink is cheaper but it's not a long term solution.
It's so rural in my area that you will not get cell signals out here. 4g isn't an option. The best we can get is either satellite or 1mb dsl.
I'm in a rural town (less than 2k population), and we still have fucking DSL offerings available. It's wild. 4G expanded out here right before covid, but it's still really spotty and there's too many users for the tower's broadband, so it's actually kinda slow.
Regardless of the obvious moneygrab corruption, It's not like the fiber program was ever going to work in the first place as long as private ISP's were involved.
Fiber backbone got installed along 25 miles of rural county highway out in the valley my parents live in. The company paid to do it marks the area as "service coming soon".
That was in 2018. The fiber is still dark with all the distribution boxes empty and not hooked up to anything, the only other options being $110/mo DSL in a very few select spots, a local mountaintop microwave wireless service that is basically turned off from November until April, or Starlink... and I'm guessing it'll forever remain that way until the coming collapse of the USA.
view more: next ›