A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
I fucking hope so. Putin would take over the world if he could so we need to back Ukraine for our own sake.
Somewhat hyperbolic but I definitely agree that if NATO wasn't in the way he'd happily reclaim USSR territory.
Trump's committed to butchering Europe with Putin's help: that's WHY Canada & Greenland require, in his reality, to be possessed, as military staging-grounds for smashing the hated by Putin & Trump woke-EU.
They want to be the ONLY world "kings" alive.
NATO is now trojan'd, & NOT going to fight-against Russia for ANY reason, whatsoever, unless it kicks the US out.
The butchering of the world is beginning.
7y from now, & there should only be 3 empires left, & the remnant-of-NATO against all-3 empires.
The US is going to declare war on Canada in less than 3y, if Canada won't aquiesce to being butchered, willingly.
& there is nothing I can do to prevent it. ( I'm a Canuck )
_ /\ _
He’d have already pulled the little green men trick in the Baltic states and Poland if they weren’t in NATO.
Just about any nation would take over the world if they could.
Darn you, Liechtenstein!!
Them & Micronesia, definitely..
: p
Probably. Putin is psycho enough to do it though
Why the wait to send in peackeepers. Russia shore did not (if im not mistaken they initially called their troop buildup peacekeepers). Would be ironic if the uk and eu ended up defending ukraine with troops given both the us and russia signed a treaty saying they would. I mean russias a backstabber but the us is the person who said they would help and did not (I know we did some stuff but given the treaty we signed we should have stopped the annexation of crimea)
If you are referring to the Budapest Memorandum, the UK signed that as well.
oh. yeah so not really any better than the us although future action looks like it might be better.
Well, that's what it's going to take.
We can't just funnel money to the MIC all day and expect things to work out. People need to be willing to die for what they believe in.