this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
37 points (79.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

38859 readers
1218 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

when they started denying real progressive candidates a shot at running for president. clinton, pelosi, schumer, all old, soft pussies too afraid to shake the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, surely people capable of denying someone popular are soft pussies. It's the opposite, they impose their will upon the party. Evil, not pussies.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Obama did it (kind of); he moved the party line to be policy oriented instead of stunts and cutthroat politics.

At the same time, he never gained a sufficient majority to enact his platform (in truth we're lucky we got the affordable care act). Biden ran into similar issues with what was technically a majority but that had weak votes (e.g. Manchin).

Honestly the problem is the Senate; Democrats just can't get past the threshold that would let them actually govern. So we get Democratic presidents that appear ineffective ... when really we just have a Senate that's broadly ineffective at doing anything that isn't center right.

A Promised Land by Obama is an extremely good book if you want to understand the modern democratic party. Obama did a lot to get the spark back but also was in a very difficult position.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Obama had a majority too. The problem is too many members rowing in different directions within the party.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

This is what I believe will always be the root of democrat's inaction: too many directions for improvement. Both sides want the country to be better, right? So let's talk about what the democrats, liberals, and progressives want. They want, in no particular order, reproductive freedom, religious freedom, racial equality, gender equality, socialist welfare, cheaper and more effective healthcare, reduced citizen financial burden, cleaner air, healthier ecosystems, more efficient transportation, more efficient energy production, and global societal cooperation, to name a dozen. What do we tackle first? Some would say reproductive freedom is of the utmost importance because that will cause society to collapse the fastest. Some say climate change policy is the most important because the irreversible damage is growing exponentially. Then some would say the financial crisis is the priority because none of the rest matters if the population is pushed to homeless starvation. 13 theoretical representatives push 13 different utopian priorities.

Now say there's 20 reps in total, 7 being republicans and conservatives. What would make the country better for them? Well, looking at the much less diverse demographic, take half of the above goals but append "white, Christian, patriarchal, wealthy" to the citizens they wish to appease and throw out the other half of the topics. Instead of providing progressive policy that balances benefits for all citizens, they smaller group: the "majority" of the nation that represents only about 1/3 of the population. All these 7 conservatives have to do is fold their arms and say no to whatever policy the liberals are pushing. They don't have to agree on how to best revert the country back to the good old days when liberal subgroups give them easy targets. Reject wildlife restrictions and their constituents will feel good because it's not their forest. Reject clean air acts because their constituents will believe the air is the way it is. Reject social welfare because their constituents believe the money saved will make them wealthy. Reject reproductive freedom because their constituents will blame it all on personal choice for others, God's mysterious ways for themselves. Reject gender equality because their constituents believe in the patriarchy. Reject global cooperative initiatives bevause their constituents believe America is a freestanding nation.

13 democrats line up as individuals while 7 Republicans stand with elbows linked, calling "red rover, red rover, send your policies over" ready to block it as a team of negativity. To break through the wall, democrats have to compromise with each other first on the division of resources, watering down each of their goals. The it gets watered down again with something that might pass the whole group. Multiple policies get tied together as one big bill, not one item at a time. This is what makes it so frustrating when any rep gets called out for voting against some bill that supposedly is clearly for the benefit of the country. It's most like 15 different topics strung together and whatever their priority is doesn't align with its representation within that bill. Yet, voting by party lines is the only way to move forward. If they agree with the bill, then they're flopping on their core values.

Then, sprinkle in some key single-issue voter topics and you'll probably get the attention of swing voters and non-voters. I'm in a liberal area. The sane people I've talked to that turn out to vote republican are always dead set on one topic. Sometimes, they're quiet Christians that are anti-abortion. Sometimes they're hunters that shut down as soon as a liberal mentions gun control. Sometimes they're rural people who believe petroleum vehicles will be outlawed. Sometimes they believe the capitalist machine will reward them for being honest workers as soon as the corporation catches a windfall. Sometimes the techy types want nothing but net neutrality first.

The GOP machine is working exactly as designed with a dozen single issues to snag voters and blockade progress.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you trying to pass an amendment? They actually had a supermajority for 72 days. Not that they didn’t get anything done, mind you, but the point stands.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The filibuster is a thing and that regularly prevents anything from getting done without 60 votes.

Obama in his book (A Promised Land) talks about this and how his biggest regret is not ending the filibuster as his first action because it proceeded to cripple his entire administration and agenda for the majority of his presidency.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

What Obama did should be judged by what he really did, not promised, not described, not was close to do.

You can say whatever you want if it depends on majority which won't ever support you, and then claim that was your real intention.

This is simpler than average intrigue between friends or at workplace, or even of deciding whose turn it is to go for groceries, and politics are not simpler.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

They're complicit. They are bought by the same billionaires as the Republicans. As long as you can purchase a politician, we have no functional democracy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Citizens United

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The simple answer: corrupt capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Occam's barbershop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The only 'fire' effective against Nazis is a molotov cocktail or a gun cartridge.

Stop blaming the opposition for not being tough enough against fascism, unkess you're willing to take up arms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Corpo whores and owners lapdogs that's who is stuffing the Democrats now

It is fucking disgusting

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like it or not, the president is part of the system. One person doesn't change the system.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please look at current administration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is not doing it himself... He is being enables by Tue entire regime

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

one person doesn't change the system

One person is being enabled...

Sounds a lot like one person changing the system with support.

Not: these people are changing the system...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Liberals took Hollywood, Conservatives took Washington"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then explain Ronald Reagan?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

He left Hollywood

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It sucks to say but yeah. For all the talk about saving democracy they forgot about the winning elections part.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obama was a huge wuss. He came in on promises of change and did nothing but continue to placate corporations.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Dude had the mandate Trump thinks he has now to fuck the big banks and instead came in meekly asked for buy in from his opponents on everything. Huge wuss indeed.