this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
34 points (78.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

38792 readers
984 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

The only 'fire' effective against Nazis is a molotov cocktail or a gun cartridge.

Stop blaming the opposition for not being tough enough against fascism, unkess you're willing to take up arms.

[–] cetaceanprayers@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

when they started denying real progressive candidates a shot at running for president. clinton, pelosi, schumer, all old, soft pussies too afraid to shake the status quo.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Yes, surely people capable of denying someone popular are soft pussies. It's the opposite, they impose their will upon the party. Evil, not pussies.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 21 hours ago

Corpo whores and owners lapdogs that's who is stuffing the Democrats now

It is fucking disgusting

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Obama did it (kind of); he moved the party line to be policy oriented instead of stunts and cutthroat politics.

At the same time, he never gained a sufficient majority to enact his platform (in truth we're lucky we got the affordable care act). Biden ran into similar issues with what was technically a majority but that had weak votes (e.g. Manchin).

Honestly the problem is the Senate; Democrats just can't get past the threshold that would let them actually govern. So we get Democratic presidents that appear ineffective ... when really we just have a Senate that's broadly ineffective at doing anything that isn't center right.

A Promised Land by Obama is an extremely good book if you want to understand the modern democratic party. Obama did a lot to get the spark back but also was in a very difficult position.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obama had a majority too. The problem is too many members rowing in different directions within the party.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you trying to pass an amendment? They actually had a supermajority for 72 days. Not that they didn’t get anything done, mind you, but the point stands.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The filibuster is a thing and that regularly prevents anything from getting done without 60 votes.

Obama in his book (A Promised Land) talks about this and how his biggest regret is not ending the filibuster as his first action because it proceeded to cripple his entire administration and agenda for the majority of his presidency.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

What Obama did should be judged by what he really did, not promised, not described, not was close to do.

You can say whatever you want if it depends on majority which won't ever support you, and then claim that was your real intention.

This is simpler than average intrigue between friends or at workplace, or even of deciding whose turn it is to go for groceries, and politics are not simpler.

[–] TheFANUM@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They're complicit. They are bought by the same billionaires as the Republicans. As long as you can purchase a politician, we have no functional democracy

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

Citizens United

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The simple answer: corrupt capitalism.

Occam's barbershop.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like it or not, the president is part of the system. One person doesn't change the system.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Please look at current administration.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He is not doing it himself... He is being enables by Tue entire regime

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago

one person doesn't change the system

One person is being enabled...

Sounds a lot like one person changing the system with support.

Not: these people are changing the system...

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Liberals took Hollywood, Conservatives took Washington"

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then explain Ronald Reagan?

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

He left Hollywood

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It sucks to say but yeah. For all the talk about saving democracy they forgot about the winning elections part.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obama was a huge wuss. He came in on promises of change and did nothing but continue to placate corporations.

[–] Kryptenx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Dude had the mandate Trump thinks he has now to fuck the big banks and instead came in meekly asked for buy in from his opponents on everything. Huge wuss indeed.