Photography

5117 readers

109 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Ever have an idea that doesn't work out the way you imagined it? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is one of those shots.

I live near an office park with a pretty reflective building. I've been thinking about trying to get a sunset photo reflecting off the building for a while now, but I have younger kids and sunsets and bedtimes coincide with each other for a good portion of the year. One morning I noticed that sunrises were fairly colorful, but instead of getting a reflection standing in a field I was now in a parking lot.

Reasons why I'm not a fan of this shot:

parking lot! I could crop it out, but then there would be nothing in the foreground and I'm not sure I would be a fan
I shot this with my 35mm, which means that I was fairly close to the building and looking up. This means less sunrise in the reflection (oh, you mean that's what the color in the bottom right is?). I should have probably used the long end of my telephoto, but I didn't have it with me and also didn't have much time
The joys of architectural photography without a tilt shift lens
I should have squared up to the building a bit better so at least one line was vertical

Live and learn. I'll try again this summer when the sun goes down after the kids are asleep and I have more time.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love the non euclidian wireless tower!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

It really is amusing how not-flat glass windows actually are. If I ever take the sunset version of this photo there will be no tower, but that might actually be a loss for the photo.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The building looks almost transparent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Edit: this is not the look I was going for originally, but I can see why it might be interesting.

/Edit

Another reason not to like the photo, lol. More reflection of the sun coming up would make it more obvious that there's a building there. That's actually where the idea originally came from: a darker sky behind a building with a bright sunset.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Take it as a happy accident.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You're right / glass half full!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I like the transparent building!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can fake the tilt shift look in a lot of editors. Assuming you mean adjusting the perspective so the top of the building has the same scale as the bottom. I’ve done this a few times with solid results.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the tip, I will look into this the next go-round!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For one, I appreciate you being real with your photos.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks! We all learn by trial and error, why not share our failures/learning opportunities for the benefit of ourselves (feedback!) and others (insight into the though process)?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Basically all of my shots come out shittier than I had imagined it, which I then use for fuel of my GAS. lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Thankfully most of my shots that I don't get are usually a composition miss or flawed idea. Sometimes even both.

I've found I don't require a ton of gear anymore. Currently I have four primes and a telephoto to go along with an A9II. The primes are actually focal length pairs - two smaller/lighter versions and two bigger/faster versions

Sigma Contemporary 35mm F2 DG DN. This is a great lens
Sigma Art 35mm F1.4 DG HSM. This is the old version of the lens, but it's perfectly serviceable. It is a bit chunky though
Sony 50mm FE 1.8. If you're a Sony shooter and don't have a 50mm prime you should grab this lens. It's very cheap new and used examples cost even less. It's also pretty compact/light. It might not be the absolute best lens, and it's focus motor is pretty loud, but it's a serviceable walk around
Sony 50mm GM 1.4. This was my splurge
Tamron's 150-500. Great for outdoor sports. My subjects are small (young) and the extra 100mm over Sony's 100-400 are worth "only" getting 15 FPS

The fast primes, combined with my 8 year old sensor, handle low light just fine. My shots are nearly all candid, so I don't find myself wanting for a flat

There are some shots I just can't get because I don't have the right gear, but I don't fret too much about those.

I am considering picking up a macro lens this spring since I've sold my OM-1 and enjoy taking bee photos. In the future I might pick up a 70-200 zoom, but that's not really a strong want right now.