this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
284 points (96.7% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Totally not an ominous or fucked up to say when blue states are absolutely recoiling in horror at the fucking disgrace of a president he is /s

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I feel like Saddam Hussein did this move.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

BREAKING NEWS

"Government declares Democratic party a terrorist organization " Jails all members"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

That would be straight out of Hitler's playbook, so I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Republican understanding of elections

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

The big big surprise is election interference. Which isn't even a little surprise. The guys a fucking dumbass

[–] [email protected] 74 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

85% of all counties in America

Empty land doesn't vote, you moron. You can be 2000 counties up and only win by a couple million votes, because rural counties are... rural.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

According to the US election system empty land absolutely does vote. That is largely how you got into this whole mess in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

According to the popular vote, yes. But the popular vote hasn’t mattered for many, many years. Of the many things Trump has shone a spotlight on, this has been the most blatant.

e: It only sways the results if enough members of the EC are more afraid of the populace than the party leadership.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Empty land does, in fact, vote...under the racist system that our founding slaveholders pushed for.

If your state isn't green, call your state representative (bonus: the one more likely to give a shit)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

The fact that compromised states like Texas and Florida are pending makes me think this will be a mechanism for right wing fuckery.

Oops, turns out that all of these states controlled by the GOP voted 100% republican with no oversight from the feds. Hand over your EC votes please 🫴

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are you not aware that tumbleweed leans heavily regressive?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

... a Russian plant

Come on man it was right there!

[–] [email protected] 150 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

So he's planning to rig the mid term elections.

[–] [email protected] 109 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Same as all the elections since Republicans stole the 2000 election. Voters suppression and misinformation propaganda have kept them in the spotlight.

I am confident that this most recent election was rigged simply based on how nothing has been reported on invetigations of the areas where the election deniers were running the show and Republicans are constantly projecting their worst behavior. The fact that they claim prior elections were stolen is a solid sign they were planning on stealing one and this would be the one because it aligns with Project 2025.

They will absolutely be leaning into more voter suppression and will be emboldened to alter the actual vote counts themselves to make it look like their voting ratio is even higher.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

Yes, this will be outright vote manipulation. Russia-style.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I also strongly believe that the last election was rigged, and am worried that no one really seems to be looking into it. Between Trump's own claims that he would win no matter what and Elon "It's just one line of code" Musk there is enough to be concerned with. Most likely, I think they simply didn't count a bunch of Dem votes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

So he's planning to ~~rig~~ cancel the mid term elections.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah way more likely he's going to use mass protests as a pretext for Martial Law and canceling elections indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 36 minutes ago

He accused Zelenskyy of this, which to me says he'll definitely do it himself

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Tinfoil hat time, but im more concerned that some kind of false flag would happen on a boarder city. Kill a lot of people, blame it on migrants, close the border, declare martial law, cancel elections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago

An American Reichstag fire

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It has been for years, especially if all this info about the extremely insecure voting machines, starlink, ballot manipulating code, stingrays, etc is true, which it seems to be.

I cannot for the life of me understand why none of the dems in power are talking about this election being fixed. Other countries have spoken up about the same thing happening to them. At least one has demanded new elections. There seems to be plenty of evidence that this happened in the U.S., so why would they refuse to acknowledge it? Do they think people won't believe them? They keep trying to play by rules that conservatives have long since abandoned. I just don't understand anything anymore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 32 minutes ago

Because they spent the last four years with the conservatives falsely claiming it for 2020 and want to look like they're taking the high road by accepting the results and making a big show about doing a peaceful transfer of power

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Starlink will provide the Internet connection!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 18 hours ago (12 children)

Are we really sharing the dailymail

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Red states are so woke they take more money from the fed than they give! Buncha socialists if you ask me!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That's the point, always.

When it comes to displays of hypocrisy, it's a show of power. I get to do this, you don't. It's on purpose to show you that they're in control and they get to do things you don't even though you're actually following rules and decorum. They don't have to and they want you to know it. "Hypocrite" is not an insult to them, it just means they've shown you their power and are happy to be called such.

It's just like with bosses and workers. Workers do all the real labor that makes a business function, but the bosses take all the winnings. Bezos can't deliver all those packages or roll out all those AWS servers on his own, but he gets to brutalize his employees and basically do fuck all not working because the real people who don't actually want to fucking work are the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago

Not surprising tbh.

I'm expecting him to falsely claim election fraud tomorrow after the exit polls in Germany close. If the result isn't AfD at 99%, he'll probably demand new elections and/or only recognize Weidel as Chancellor instead of Merz.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, not happening. Get ready for Civil War part deux.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago

Start buying guns now before they take that away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Everyone needs to be contacting their reps about election security. It's obvious the last election was rigged, and they are confident they can do it again with money or otherwise. We should all be in the ear of our elected officials about improving election security, because it starts at the county level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

He must be stopped

[–] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago

Looking over the Daily Mail (ugh), it sounds more like he expects a red wave. He says we're in for a surprise, but that's the kind of shit they always say.

That's not to say they won't reuse their bullshit playbook (lies, voter intimidation, etc) but so far the most pressing issue we have in the midterms in all states are just milquetoast neolib Democrats running the party, likely to thumb the scales on primary season yet again. You raise the energy of the opposition and the opposition will practically camp overnight in line to cast a vote (and volunteer to vote count, etc).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Half serious question: can Trump order state borders to be modified? He wouldn’t be creating/destroying a state…I really don’t know the practical limits of presidential power anymore.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 17 hours ago

He absolutely does not have the authority, nor is there anyone at the federal level to do so.

But it doesn't mean he won't try anyway, or that anyone would stop him.

(The rare occasions of a state possibly splitting have come from within the state itself)

load more comments
view more: next ›