Comics
This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.
Rules:
1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules
2- Be civil.
3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.
4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.
5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.
Guidelines:
- If possible, give us your sources.
- If possible, credit creators of each comics in the title or body of your post. If you are the creator, please credit yourself. A simple “- Me” would suffice.
- In general terms, write in body of your post as much information as possible (dates, creators, editors, links).
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the ‘Link’ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- One post by topic.
Oh absolutely, but you can substitute pretty much anyone in there and the overarching point is still valid
Žižek my love ♥️♥️♥️♥️
Zizek doesn't say crap like this, he is very much against state capitalism
mems without a clue and pseudo rebels without a cause
Zizek is very much against any revolution that doesn't happen entirely in the abstract. He's a funny polemicist but the few times he doesn't write three pages of nonsensical, circular, stream of consciousness references to Heidegger, Lacan or Jung, he's shilling the most neoliberal viewpoints you can imagine.
Neoliberal in what way? Give me an example.
If you mean neoliberal as being anti-state ... then you are intentionally misinterpreting what he says so your rhetoric feels secure.
Davel linked an article by Rockhill that goes into detail. But if you'd read "Against the Double Blackmail" you'd think calling his views neoliberal is a very charitable take considering he spent most of the book being horribly racist and chauvinistic whenever he wasn't horribly incoherent.
Which is to be expected of anyone proudly calling himself an eurocentrist. Just because somebody goes and says they're a Marxist or a historical materialist or whatever doesn't make it so, you have to look at their praxis. There's been "Marxist" opportunists for as long as there's been Marxism.