sorry. the climate is gonna have to take a number.
there's a more imminent threat to civilization as we know it that needs to be destroyed first. doing that will help the climate, too.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
sorry. the climate is gonna have to take a number.
there's a more imminent threat to civilization as we know it that needs to be destroyed first. doing that will help the climate, too.
Both efforts are intertwined and can run in parallel
I'm more just disgusted with the NYT editorial staff remembering Climate Justice is a thing four months after the election.
The run up to the vote was wall-to-wall "Immigrant Menace!" / "Uppity Transgender!" / "College Antisemitism!" hit pieces. But hey, maybe now we can take a moment to recall that the dwindling NYT readership does still care about liberal policies rather than conservative red meat.
Alas, the NYT readership is not dwindling, but instead their subscriber base is growing quite rapidly
This. That the Times has the balls to call this out now is really something.
that's essentially his superpower. he literally doesn't shut up.
Wow NYTIMES, fuck you.
I read Nudge and enjoyed it, despite agreeing with many of the criticisms of it. The writing style was accessible and entertaining, so I'll probably check this out.
No.