this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
193 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

62161 readers
3737 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

Canada might need these sooner rather than later.

With the breakdown of democracy and the rule of law in America, the Constitution just became wholly unenforceable and therefore irrelevant. That means that Trump could make good on his fever dream of invading Canada.

And there are many Americans who would jump at the chance to obey his command to slaughter Canadians. With only 40M against America’s 334M - and 0.097M military personnel against America’s 2.1M - it would be absolutely no contest.

Our only way of making such a fascist act of aggression as painful as possible would be with asymmetrical warfare using tiny, hard-to-defeat drones that could act independently and strike without warning. Deploy 10k of these suckers onto a battlefield, and the only survivors would be those within sealed armour or flying at high altitude. Because even an A10 Warthog loitering low over the field can be taken out if it unexpectedly ingests a half-dozen of the explosive buggers.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dear technology under capitalism... We just want healthcare, housing, etc... We don't fucking need swarms of robot insects.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Just today I was watching this video:

How we came to hate technology

[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 days ago (6 children)

We all know where this is gonna end...

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surveillance drones everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surveillance is the "nice" version of it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly! Flying, they are flying everywheeeaaahhhh!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've low-key started to think the only reason we haven't seen autonomous hunter-killer drones yet is that nobody's willing to break the seal, and I'm scared for what happens when somebody finally does.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My dear stranger, those already exist, and have been used in war to terminate key individuals.

We are living the dream.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

key individuals

Such as Palestinian children

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Point me towards systems that don't have a human in the loop, particularly any that utilize fully-autonomous swarms, and I'll agree. Scary as the former are, there's a world of difference between a handful of FPV suicide drones, and a cloud of HL2-Manhack-esque things operating on face-recogniton-guided autopilot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, that's what you mean... yeah, there are humans behind, but potato potato, swap one brain for another... anyway it is a killing machine that can get you anywhere in the planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The humans are using ai to pick the targets they kill anyway. They theoretically are supposed to parse out the bad targets, but we know from examples listed in the above, that for genocidal states like Israel, that review is intentionally ignored or minimized.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Horizon Zero Dawn looking more eminent any day now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

They are definitely super willing to break the seal, just nobody has built a good target ID system yet that won't fire on civilians.

If you just need everyone in a 10 mile radius dead, you could send in the hunter bots, or you could just shell the area with heavy artillery from three countries away. We already have that problem solved. Once we have a reliable target ID system I guarantee you'll start seeing unmanned equipment in war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

In the latest video about this by veritasium, he asked the researcher about ethics concern. the researcher insist that they dont care as humanity can decide for itself.

Meanwhile:

The new report also details the extent of MIT’s partnerships with Israeli military contractors like Elbit Systems, which supplies 85 percent of Israel’s killer drones, and Maersk, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, that has sent millions of pounds of military goods to Israel since the start of the war on Gaza. The Israeli military also sponsored several of the MIT projects with funds provided by the U.S. Defense Department.

https://theintercept.com/2025/01/16/mit-israel-military-funding-research-gaza/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That researcher is a real life Dr. Hoenikker. Vonnegut is probably shrugging in his grave

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

-…his mother was completely consumed by robotic bees. So it goes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

“We are willing to ignore and downplay the ethical concerns as long as the money keeping coming in”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'd rather just have bees.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But how can techbros get rich from bees? Bees just make themselves for free then serve the greater good, the little buzzing communists.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even birds are starting to seem acceptable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

oh so you think birds aren't already flying robots? robot bees are just the next step.

/s obviously

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've seen this episode of Black Mirror.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fall into me

And drown inside me

I know you will see

The beauty of me

Also, I've seen this episode of Tom Scott.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The new technology could increase crop yields dramatically without harming the environment.

That's a surprisingly benign use case, I was expecting far worse.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plot twist: The crop is human misery.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Well then fucking harvest me and get it over with

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

The public use case.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I guess I'm the only one thinking about how it's inevitable that birds and other animals will mistake them for real insects and die from ingesting these things, god knows what kind of toxic materials they're made of but I'm willing to bet it's not safe to eat them

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Without a doubt they will have those other use cases in mind too. Mentioning them is just not good for marketing in public.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because developing a replacement for bees is certainly a better solution then saving the bees...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They think there will be more profit in it, especially since bees can't be repurposed as weapons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How's this for an obscure reference? This reminded me of an episode of Max Headroom in which the wunderkind Bryce invented a robotic fly with a spycam that could be used to literally bug a room. They send it on a mission to uncover an evil plot and everyone is excitedly crowded around the screen and heaping praise on it. Then it manages to sneak into the evil lair where it promptly gets swatted, leaving Bryce shocked and devastated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

They also did this in Spy Kids

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It wont be long now before the nanobots exist and the Borg can finally take over. Resistance is futile.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

the Borg

Sounds like communism...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Nope, I’m out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think there was an X-Files episode about this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Looks like they hovered for 1000 seconds. It was previously stress limited such that the joints would break after just a few seconds. I think they might still be tethered for a power source, I haven't seen any of these micro flapping bots include a battery yet, and they didn't mention that they did.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adp4256

load more comments
view more: next ›