this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6903 readers
517 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should bring the G11 back with pyrolytic graphite saboted ammo. It wouldn't increase the weight or bulk much at all, and its thermal properties would allow the case to absorb heat much better than brass. It wouldn't technically be careless, but if the sabot is ejected with the bullet, then it's practically the same. I wonder how well compressed carbon would work with regular rifling.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When I worked for H&K I've been told that when the project got cancelled they had already dealt with the heat problems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aaah that's cool as hell. Yeah, I think I remember they reformulated the explosive to be less heat sensitive and cook-offy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't know what they did, I think all or most people who had to do with it were already gone. Sadly it was also one of the few H&K weapons I couldn't get the chance to fire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

HK g11 needs to be added