this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
203 points (99.5% liked)

Games

33223 readers
1656 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the graveyard of live service games Concord may just be the biggest headstone, and that seems to have focused some minds over at PlayStation. Previously the noises coming from Sony were all about the importance of live service games to its future strategy, and it had announced plans to launch more than 10 live service games by the 2025 fiscal year, which ends on March 31, 2026.

Now? Not so much. A new Bloomberg report reveals that "following a recent review" PlayStation has canceled two unannounced live service games in development at subsidiaries Bend Studio and Bluepoint Games. Bend is best-known for Days Gone and, back in the day, Syphon Filter, while Bluepoint mainly handles high-profile remakes like Demon's Souls.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, cancelling this seems like a good call.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao. GoW live service? Fucking hell it's video games by committee.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 33 minutes ago

This was inevitable as soon as games started getting the budgets of blockbuster movies. No one wants to invest that much money into a project without getting some oversight and control in return.

Of course, very, very few people who have access to that kind of cash have any design sense whatsoever, and even fewer understand the creative process, or what makes games "good"... so they ask for shit that they think will be "safe" money-makers, and we get what we get: endless, samey, soulless shlock.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago

A God of War live service game? Who the fuck signed off on that? I'm glad the article was able to zero in on the blistering stupidity of such a thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Looks like we dodged a bullet with God of we're live service.

[–] [email protected] 142 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

While playing the single player masterpiece which was God of War, I absolutely thought: "The only way to make this game better is if I had the luxury of buying a battle pass to grind for seasonal cosmetics along with a dozen other people." 🤤🤤🤤🤑

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Live service deez nuts. Shitty trend that needs to die.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

Live service games generate a constant income with minimal effort once it's live. It will only die if players stop spending money on such games.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I can't imagine how it sucks to being these devs. They obviuosly earned more and lived better than me, but I'd have a hard time parting with some project even if they are all mismanaged unborn messes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

I was a professional developer in a wide range of gaming areas for about 20 years... Looking back, I can honestly say that 95% of the work I did ended up as a vapor... The 5% that made it to market were so fleeting...

I derived my satisfaction not from completing projects, but solving the underlying problems. That kept me very engaged.

But yeah, not everybody sees things this way.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Good riddance. Seems like Sony got the message; we're sick of everything being a "live service".

[–] [email protected] 43 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Well, no.
Deep Rock Galactic has fully optional skin packs to make money and they're doing great.

Warframe has been chugging along for over a decade now and they're doing great. Beating the pants off of Destiny 2 for average player count.

The live service trick is that live service only works if the company actually cares about the product. Those two companies stand out because they legitimately care and have great communication with their communities.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago

DRG and Warframe also hit the critical requirement of actually being games that are fun to play!

I haven't played a lot of WF, but I've got hundreds of hours on DRG. There is no grind. Getting holiday loot takes 5 to 8 matched total, and the Seasons are long and very relaxed. I maxed out XP for this season already and the next probably won't start until at least this summer.

The community is going strong, the game is fun, Ghost Ship seems stable and like a nice place to work. It's so stupid that more companies don't see that they could run like this instead of chasing "get rich quick" corporate schemes that always alienate the fans.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

DRG doesn’t make me feel like they are taking advantage of me with their transactions because they aren’t required. It’s nice that way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

So far Warframe has been the ONLY example of a good live service game. It's the OG when it comes to the model, but it's also the exception, and not the rule.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget Path of Exile.

Id argue a bunch of early access games that get constant updates are Live Service games too.

And indie games like Terraria and Minecraft were the best examples of live service.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Why did they make an expensive game like Concord which nobody wanted? Don't they have market analysts or something like that? Everyone was able to tell them beforehand that it will flop.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

They probably started it at a time when analysis suggested it was what people wanted more of, and then during the probably what; 4 or 5 years it took to develop, interest waned?

I don’t think it was weird that they started on this; it was pretty weird that they didn’t pivot or cancel earlier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Afaik they started development when overwatch was already successful. By the time development finished the hype was over and players had moved to other genres, and had very little interest in an overwatch clone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Until Marvel Rivals showed it could still be done but you needed a very specific game for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

No, you need Marvel, like real Marvel, not GotG-lite.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Stupid question, but was is a live service game?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

The worst thing about a live service game to me is that they only work when you can connect to the official servers. Many live service games have shut down and there is no offline mode to continue playing. Sometimes you still pay full price for these games. Sometimes games like The Crew, shut down after you spent money to play it and then The Crew 2 comes out so you pay full price for essentially the same game and the first one doesn't work anymore.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

Its the definition of "you dont own the game". You pay to get access to the service of playing the game and it wants to keep you playing as long as possible so you spend more money on micro transactions. They are constantly updated, usually as some form of "season", have daily login streak bonuses, etc. And after 2 years the game shuts down and you have nothing and can't play anything you paid for anymore.

Every live service game that fails or gets cancled is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Game they keep updating with new content and microtransactions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, and they often launch with loads of systems where future content could be plugged in, but the actual content itself is typically bad or at the very least incomplete. The publishers try too hard to build a platform rather than a good game...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

online multiplayer bullshit with monthly fees.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Monthly fees optional. These days I'd assume the battle pass model is more common.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Like a subscription base game? World of Warcraft and other alike?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

no it's like fortnite or cod. They're usually quickplay multiplayer games with a low cost to entry, infinite grinding potential, and microtransaction hell

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, theoretically the exact model for monetization isn't as important, but many publishers are hoping to get players to pay subscriptions indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Basically a game that is continuously updated with new content. Lots of different models of it from MMOs to Fortnite to Diablo IV. Many of them are free to play with lots of microtransactions. They usually feature things like seasons and battle passes and loot boxes. They're almost always heavily monetized. The competition in the "genre" is incredibly fierce since most people probably only play a handful of them and friend groups usually all want to be on the same game. It's very hard to break into. Sony announced that they were making a big investment into the area a few years ago and news has been trickling out since that most of them have been canceled.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It’s for the best. The series deserves better than live service.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You want to make money? Let bluepoint make a bloodborne remaster and bring it to PC.

Like, make the obvious good and profitable decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I feel like it’s the same 12 people loudly asking for Bloodbourne.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

But hear me out. Battle passes, dark patterns and FOMO.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

All I read here is that there are still 8 too many live service games in development. Are execs addicted to gambling or what? Because that’s exactly what live service game development is. Also I would like to know what kind of research they are doing that indicates that more live service games is what the market wants, when people who play them rarely ever switch once they find the one they like and at this point there are entirely too many of them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Live service games that become successful can make billions of dollars, so everyone is trying to be the next big one. Having a ton of concurrent live service projects is the "throw shit at a wall and see what sticks" strategy. They expect most to fail but hope that the 1 that succeeds makes up for it and then some.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

cancelled God of War sequel

"That's bad!"

Live service

"That's good!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't even know what a God of War live service game would be like but I can't imagine it would be good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

About as good as Castlevania being a pachinko game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

Good! Wonder what trend the brain-dead CEOs are going to chase after now. Cozy games?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Since games take 5+ years to make now we're probably in for a wave of metaverse products.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Just ask "what is making money" to get the answer. It's still live service and gacha shit, but I'm sure they'll try to add machine learning to it somehow cause you gotta have that

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Bend is best-known for Days Gone and, back in the day, Syphon Filter

Are we just gonna pretend Bubsy 3D never existed?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Damn. Bubsy 3D to Days Gone. What a redemption arc lol

load more comments
view more: next ›