this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
828 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59424 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hope this isn't a repeated submission. Funny how they're trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Well, they have a point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (24 children)

Why anyone would ever trust somebody else with their DNA data is beyond me.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'm just of the general opinion that any personal data you entrust to any corporation is going to be at risk - regardless of it's assurances. There's also a risk of that corporation being legitimately acquired by another thus nullifying previous TOS, etc. Or worse case, they sell all your info anyway. Connected technology is moving quickly. What might seem safe to share today could become the basis of an insurance claim denial when they discover a genetic predisposition they believe you were obligated to disclose.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›