this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
281 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"alt-right women are upset that alt-right men are treating them terribly

some prominent alt-right women are calling for more equality and acceptance within the movement"

🤔

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago

JFC...

"Why are you acting like the lying liberals say you act!? I don't believe you act the way you really do because they say you do! Stop being you, you're making the liberals look correct!"

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

Darn alt-right feminists!

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They know that, according to GOP’s leadership, they’re not even supposed to hold office? They’re supposed to be in the kitchen making sandwiches. Also popping out babies.

And they wonder why?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

"But I'm one of the good ones. They clearly don't mean me."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The incoming health secretary says it's fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, it’s convenient. Someone’s gotta keep an eye on the bun in the oven while delivering the bun in the oven.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, now I'm oddly hungry to eat a baby.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You gotta wait the full 9 months, else it's a crime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

the kitchen or the baby sandwiches?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

And you wonder why I won’t eat at their house?

They don’t believe in soap either.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

44% of women aged 18-44 and 48% of women over 45 voted for a rapist to lead them. (AP Data) Like what do these voters and female Republican politicians expect at this point? DE&I is "woke" according to them, but did they also know that listening to women is "woke" to Republicans too?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

If you sort the data by "women by race" you get a better picture. 53% of white women voted for trump, which made up for the only 10% of black women who voted for him, and 39% of latina women.

Not that it takes away from what you're saying, i just think white women in particular really screwed themselves over here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a typo at the beginning of this, or I can't read

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, will fix:

44% of women ~~voted~~ aged 18-44 and 48% of women over 45[,] voted for a rapist to lead them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

That's what I had thought, but I just thought it could help some people's, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I don’t know why there wasn’t one who was able to become a chairperson of a committee..."

Because if the Republicans have their way, womens roles will be "Tradwife" and nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

They could also be property to be bought, sold, and traded.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“We’ve never been the party that was about checking boxes or identity politics, but the difference is we have women that are qualified to be chairs, and I don’t know why there wasn’t one who was able to become a chairperson of a committee," she added.

Translation: “I never cared that my party discriminated against other people, but now they’re doing it to meeeeee!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know that hypocrisy is their whole thing, but it's still hard to wrap my mind around a Republican genuinely believing that they're not about identity politics, as if that isn't what their entire platform is based on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Republicans have always been fans of turning real things into incorrectly used buzz words. “Identity politics” means “changing the status quo to include others,” and so only applies to Democrats. “Catering exclusively to bigoted white Christian nationalists who openly want to establish a theocracy” doesn’t count by that metric.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

now. now. elections over and everyone has their place. someones got to feed the men while they lead.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m frankly surprised that they’re surprised

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not.

They thought they were one of the good ones, in the minority group.

Same thing with the log cabin Republicans doing the surprised_pikachu.jpg when the GOP passed them over for everything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Something about that parable where the trees vote for the axe because the handle is made of wood. Guess the modern version is /leopardsatemyface.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jews for Nazism annoyed they aren't welcomed into the 3rd Reich as "the good ones."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Aw, someone missed the memo?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Face leopard blah blah blah.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

On the other hand it looks like AOC will be minority chair in Ways and Means.