I mean, it could be worse? That's definitely pretty obnoxious, though.
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
266 points (94.9% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35731 readers
2134 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know exactly what happened here having just done a renovation on a basement with a completely fucked up bathroom.
They re-used the existing piping and lines when replacing the tub and shower surrounds.
They wanted to save a few hundred dollars and/or effort of moving the pipes to center up with the prefab tub/surround, and just figured they could drill the hole into the surround for the shower attachments wherever.
They're correct, but that doesn't make them right.
More likely, there is a sistered stud directly in the center of the surround, and to fix it properly, they would have to tear out both sides of the wall.
Offsetting the valve to one side or the other, they don't have to do any additional demolition, framing, or drywall.
Source: been there, done that...
Ah, that's possibly true as well. Good catch.
I actually like it better this way, as I wouldn't have to reach in as far to turn it on. I think having controls there and the spigot on the corner on the left would be best, though.
I don't get it. What's the problem?
I agree. It'd be kind of nice to have it off to the side.
Showerhead seems like an issue. I guess if you can articulate it to point to the wall and the wall is well sealed it's probably ok.
The wall has to be well sealed. This is better. The shower head is pointed away from the curtain. Less water on the floor.
Other side, sure. On the entrance side you might stub your toe.
I ... find it functionally superior (less water splashback) and also kinda aesthetically more pleasing than if it were centred (within the chosen parameters of colours/materials/designs ... which bother me more, looks cheap).
I also find it dirty (prob right after the work was done).
I would rinse it a bit before posting pics.
... actually the offset might be for accessibility reasons - so people with mobility issues (eg in wheelchairs) can get to the faucet easier. Which is always a good design option imho.
It's not mildly infuriating at all, it's mildly pleasing.
Also, easier to share a bath without one person having their head squashed to side of tap. If you put on hot water, you're not getting the pain as it runs on to your feet. This is an innovation.
Many baths here in the UK have it in the corner against the wall.
Seconded. Leaves good wall space to the left for a soap or shampoo holder.
As ugly as it is, at least it works. I kind of like offset spigots, but this was obviously just a mistake/laziness.
That looks like the narrowest tub I've ever seen. I assume they renovated the place and made the bathroom smaller to add an extra bedroom or something, and they just shrank the wall without changing the plumbing.
Just a hunch, but probably a stud right in the middle and they either didn't want to deal with it, or didn't know how to move it. Makes sense if it's someone watching a video and doing it themselves to save money.
What fresh hells is this? Non-centered plumbing? Your right to symmetry is being violated bro.
It’s fug, if still functional.
Looks very British
Screams low rent American to me
Yeah why save hundreds of dollars not moving the whole fucking plumbing lines so youe fucking shower spigot is on fucking center line🤣🤣🤣 for every asshole landlord there is a bitchy fuckin cunt renting from them🤣
Low rent? This would be $3000/Mo in NYC. Somehow landlords here manage to find the smallest half-tubs that don't actually work for shit.
A closet with a toilet that doubles as the kitchen sink would be $3k in NYC.
No way that's up to code
What's the reason it wouldn't be up to code? Seems fine from a safety perspective, though a little unorthodox.
The woogity nub is close enough for a cat to distract the bather with constant woogeting.
This is the way
Report that shit and cost the Asshole more