this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
120 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
1262 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am a long term GrapheneOS user and would like to talk about it. r/privacy on the redditland blocks custom OS discussions which I think is very bad for user privacy, and I hope this post will be useful to anyone who are in the hunt for better privacy.

Nowadays smartphones are a much bigger threats to our privacy and Desktop systems, and unfortunately manufacturers has designed them to be locked down devices with no user freedom. You can't just "install Linux" on most smartphones and it is horrible. And most preloaded systems spy on us like crazy. That was why I specifically bought a pixel and loaded GOS onto it.

According to https://grapheneos.org/features , they start from base AOSP's latest version, imptoves upon it's security and significantly hardens it. There's hardened_malloc to.prevent against exploitation, disabling lots of debugging features, disabling USB-c data, hardening the Linux kernel and system apps etc. They even block accessing the hardware identifiers of the phone so that apps cannot detect whqt phone you're using. That means with Tor and zero permissions given, apps are anonymous.

Compatibility with apps are best in Custom ROMs but there are still that can't work, especially if they enforce device integrity. Very few apps usually enforce that tho. Also their community isn't the friendliest but you can get help. Just don't try and engage too much or have too many debates.

Anyone else here use GrapheneOS, or any other privacy ROMs? What is your experience? Do you disagree on any point? Let's have a discussion!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

I had daily drove it for years, but recently started testing the water with iOS. Still have GOS on my secondary devices though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

i really want to make the switch but need to figure out how to steal a pixel phone bc i sure as hell ain’t paying for one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 25 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Using it since many years on many Pixels and loving it.

Main pros: zero bloat, efficient, highly secure and highly private (about as private and secure as it can get on any smartphone), and it's an Android without any of Android's typical weaknesses (privacy issues, bloat, etc.). You get to utilize the advantages of Google (its security) and completely avoid the disadvantages (its many privacy issues). You get to use all the advantages of an Android mobile OS while completely avoiding all of its disadvantages. It's like getting your cake and eating it too. You're much better off in terms of security and privacy than almost(?) all other smartphone users. According to leaked documents, Cellebrite for example can't crack GrapheneOS on Pixels at all. They can crack almost any other smartphone if they have physical access to it. Most smartphones are really easy for them to crack. iPhones may pose some trouble depending on model/OS. And Graphene on Pixel is the literal brick wall. And even on top of that it has tons of great security features, like auto-reboot after X hours of inactivity, charge-only-mode for USB-C when locked, distress/duress PIN entry to immediately wipe the phone, many things like that. On the privacy side it's looking great as well: Some folks have analyzed Graphene's network traffic and there's zero privacy issues from the OS or its built-in apps. And the few connections it does make (for updates and so on) are all documented and work exactly like they documented them, and they only transmit the exact least amount of necessary data without anything beyond that (guess what - that's super rare). And on top of that there's even more great privacy features, some of which are invisible but well thought-out, for example any SUPL request goes through a Graphene proxy server first (configurable) which strips all personally-identifiable data from the request and then redirects it to your provider's SUPL server (which is most likely Google's SUPL server in the end). I'm seriously impressed by the quality of the GrapheneOS project. Maybe you don't realize how good and rare such things are nowadays. Also the documentation is very good and actually answers most of your questions and doesn't contain any marketing blurb. The social media feeds and forums are a great source of info as well. On top of all that it's even easy to install GrapheneOS.

Main cons: it's only available on Google Pixel phones, so if you truly despise Google and don't want to buy or use anything from them, it's not the right device/OS for you (or maybe buy it used?). However, the reason GrapheneOS is on Pixel is purely a technical one: Pixels do offer very high hardware based security already (probably the most, although iPhones have good hardware-based security as well. As is known, Apple tends to be produce good quality hardware, not quite so good software) as well as a very high degree of "platform neutrality", i.e. it's supported by Google to flash a different OS on it or use more advanced tools like adb without any sort of tinkering or unnecessary danger involved. Also you don't have to register to unlock your phone or anything, you only need to be online once to enable the OEM unlocking feature (I think this is because Google needs your IMEI to check whether the phone is carrier-locked (cannot ever be OEM unlocked) or can be unlocked, and they will immediately receive some device data including the IMEI as soon as you go online with the preinstalled Android OS once [of course they will receive some more device data than just the IMEI]), so it's best to not insert your SIM yet (and not do anything with the preinstalled OS) before you've installed GrapheneOS on your new Pixel. Do the OEM unlocking step on WiFi only, best on a public WiFi so Google has much less of a chance to identify you based on your IP or related data. Then install Graphene, then insert your SIM and start using your new phone. Other cons exist but they're rare or pretty much irrelevant in daily use. If you have to hear them, read an older post by me about some potential downsides: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/19867254/12069767

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I use GrapheneOS but I don't like how Google Play-centric it is. It is geared towards people installing their "normal" apps with the GrapheneOS special sauce sandboxing. No F-Droid by default where all of the FOSS apps are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I am. It's good. Don't have any issues just huge compliments to the team.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I have the pleasure of using GrapheneOS. I can't imagine using anything else. It was also the first (widely used) custom Android distribution to adopt Android 15. As far as I can tell, almost no others support Android 15 yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

I've been on GrapheneOS for 4 years or so. I've tried CalyxOS every now and then, but always end up coming back to GrapheneOS. I find it simple, private, secure and free of BS. CalyxOS does come with some stuff preinstalled, which doesn't really appeal to me, and I trust the sandboxes Google Play model much more that MicroG.

About the devs, I really haven't had any issues that I have not been able to resolve myself, so my interaction with the is non-existing. I have read some posts with interactions with them, and they do seem to be hostile towards anything that is not 100% aligned with their train of thought, which I find stupid, to say the least. But regardless of how rude they may be, I feel GOS literally has no competition in the Android landscape in terms of privacy and security.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is the camera still good on Graphene? It is pretty much the only thing that holds my Oneplus 6T back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The camera is fine but I prefer to use googles camera app. Both work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

You can even install Google Camera app without google play services and deny it Internet access. All works fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I use the Google camera app as well, it's just better

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

My recommendation is GOS if you care about out of box experience and using gapps, DivestOS if you care about degoogling and removal of proprietary code. Both are hardened.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I would absolutely buy a Pixel, if only they supported sd-cards. I get that Google is pushing cloud-storage. If I smash my phone on the sidewalk, I still want to have a local storage, I can take out and thus make live backups to. There are just some features Pixels lack and privacy shouldn't lock you out of them.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I post someone's comment on a controversial topic about google and GOS. I saved it because that's exactly how I feel.


Step 1 of installing GrapheneOS for de-googling your life: Buy a Google Pixel phone

Look - I know, I know. I get it. Google allows you to unlock the bootloader while maintaining the phone's unique and excellent hardware security features. The argument makes sense. It is compelling. Other manufacturers do not give you this freedom. I am not arguing about that. I have a Pixel phone running GrapheneOS myself.

However... It is just so very obviously ironic that one needs to trust Google's hardware and purchase a Google product to de-google their life through GrapheneOS. I think that it is a perfectly valid position for someone to raise their eyebrows, laugh, and remain skeptical of the concept either because they do not want to support Google at all, or because they simply will not trust Google's hardware.

The reason why I think that this is "controversial" is because I have seen multiple instances of someone pointing out the irony, followed by someone getting defensive about it and making use of the technical security arguments in an attempt to patch up the irony.

https://mander.xyz/comment/15084264

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's ironic but what is the alternative? At least we CAN remove Google's known spyware from the device, and there's no evidence of firmware level spying. If you get Samsung, or some chinese crap, you can't remove Google period, and you might get spied by the manufacturer as a cherry on top. There is no way to have a perfect solution, well unless Samsung starts to provide Custom ROM support or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm using a Fairphone with /e/os. No Google at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

Not hardened though. I was heavily considering fairphone but over the back and forth between them discussing with Graphene developers, their hardware is not secure enough yet for graphene to be made for the fairphones. If and when fairphones are on graphene then I will definitely buy them.

Also, even though I commend their phone, the accessories for earbuds and headphones certainly bring up some questions as to their intentions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

If your objective is to punish Google, or to have nothing to do with Google. I completely agree with you using a pixel phone just doesn't make any sense. You shouldn't do it

If your objective is to have the most security possible... Then you should install graphene on a Pixel phone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

I think buying a Pixel phone second hand solves this issue and reduces a little e-waste at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't have any answer for the point where you would not trust Google even for the hardware (even though I don't think there is any risk on the current devices)

But concerning the "don't want to support Google" an easier answer is to buy a second-hand Pixel

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I've been using a Fairphone with /e/os. No Google at all. Rooted with Magisk. MicroG to run apps that need Google services. Everything I need works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Did it come installed or did you need to complete a 27-step process involving cables and obscure commands and fiddly key combinations and the risk of bricking the thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Do Google Pixel phones come installed with GrapheneOS? We're talking about custom setups with more privacy here.

I did have to follow the installation instructions, which included unlocking my bootloader, installing adb on my PC, and entering a few command lines.

There is the possibility to buy it preinstalled though, but from a third-party company.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

Ive used it for around a year and a half and never had any issues. My banking app stopped working after about 8 months but I just log in via a browser and it hasn't effected my life at all.

For anyone considering the move here is a list of bank apps and their current working status as I know that is a big consideration people worry over.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. Been using it for about 2 years now. So far no issues except amazon prime but they gave me adds sufficiently annoying that i finally got around to setting up jellyfin. Been able to solve pretty much all my issues with dr gpt.

Every time i see someone posting about a new mobile phone exploit i get immense joy scrolling down through comments and finding someone posting the fact that graphene patched it 3 years ago and recommended a patch to google who have yet to implement it into base android.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Cellebrite and the new Grayjack or something both has zero ways to crack a GOS phone 🔥

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

Last 4 or so phones have all been GrapheneOS (I'm not buying new phones all the time to be clear; I use phones till they break; I'm just a long-time user) and yeah I've really had no problems to speak of. I currently have a separate profile with Play services for certain apps, and also just to isolate non-privacy-respecting apps that I have to have installed for whatever reason.

Almost all the apps I use are FOSS apps who are aware that a significant amount of their userbase will be using various AOSP forks so I've not run into any app compatibility issues. Even back when I used banking apps, I'd used 4 different banks' apps on GrapheneOS and all of them worked completely fine. Now I don't have a banking app because I won't install proprietary software unless I actually have to for some reason, and I can bank on the web just fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

I would but my Pixel 6's USB connection is entirely useless. It hasn't successfully connected to a cable in over a year.

I was considering it for my next one, though, whenever that is. Don't really feel the need for an upgrade atm.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (10 children)

Other than Starbucks app and VoLTE stuff, I haven't encountered an issue yet. Somehow all my banking apps work. The profile feature alone makes it worth it. They also recently increased the number of profiles that can be run in parallel, too.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (11 children)

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/distributions/#aosp-derivatives

https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm

I am a GOS user, it just works, so I don't really think about it. It's very nice to have storage and contact scopes.

My only complaint is I can't share a VPN over hotspot or tethering, which is very useful for a travel router device (to make all traffic look like it's coming from the phone). (Lineage and calyxos have this)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Personally for me the most important thing in Android is automatic native call recording. If GrapheneOS gets that, I will consider buying a Google Pixel device.

Also, banking and other apps should stop using Play Integrity API.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's okay if they use the Play Integrity API, they just need to also whitelist the keys that sign the official Graphene OS ROMs. Not that I expect they'll do that, mind you...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 33 minutes ago

That would leave LineageOS and everything else broken.

I hope EU forces Google to make Android more open again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Been using it for about five years now. I absolutely love it. But I will say some of these comments make it sound like it's a little easier than it is. I'd say about 80% of your knowledge from Android will transfer over and just work. But the last 20% is a bit of a learning curve, and will take at least a few weeks to get the hang of.

What I recommended to some of my friends that switched is to get the phone and mess around with it for a few weeks before you switch your sim. Then you'll get the hang of things like alternative app stores and sandboxed play services, and you'll figure out what you can and can't do.

I will say the vast majority of things do work easily because of protection compatibility mode and sandboxed play services. But there will be some things that are just more hassle then they're worth. I find keeping a second device, like a tablet, without a custom ROM makes that stuff easier.

And there are some things that seem impossible to get working properly, at least for me. For example, casting to a TV is basically impossible from what I can tell. Also, tap to pay, even for things like tickets doesn't work (although if you have play services, you can use Google wallet for things with barcodes).

Overall, it's totally worth trying out. Just don't set your expectations too high. You're not getting a completely "just works" experience.

As for other custom ROMs, I've tried CalyxOS and LineageOS for MicroG. I didn't find either of them quite as good, but that was many years ago. Maybe they've gotten better.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I was a long time lineageOS user and love the freedom of changing anything. I switched to grapheneOS and like it, but miss some features, that are just pointless and not relatable: no full AMOLED dark mode - the devs said the battery savings between dark and pure dark isn't relevant. and the other thing is: why is the white bar on the bottom not removable?

Because of these things I switched back to lineageOS and realised how dumb it is because of two optical features. GOS is definitely worth to look over two missing features and I switched back to GOS.

Anyway the most interesting transition from an lineage user to an grapheneOS user is, you realise that root isn't useful and more risk than fun.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Yeah GrapheneOS rarely does eye-candy features. They have a very small team so they exclusively work on security features.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›