this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
216 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32323 readers
599 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He's right on this one. We shouldn't be supporting a government that kills civilians no matter how much they try to justify it with saying there were legitimate targets behind them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Often the excuse isn't even "bad guys behind the civilians" it's "probably bad guys somewhere sort of in the general area, but we didn't actually check first".

Oh yeah, then there's the "old lady trying to drag her dying mother into a church" those are always valid targets, apparently. As is the old lady's mother before the whole being drug into a church thing.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh boy, I can't wait to see my Catholic conservative family melt down over this one lmao. Papal infallibility is fun when it's on the right side of history

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Bro the pope is infallible only if he agrees with them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pope isn't acting in an "infalliable" role with this statement, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Damn, that's disappointing. At least I still get to see them seethe over the acceptance of lgbt people

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

You’ll know by the hat

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Yesterday the same quote was posted, but instead of "on civilians" it was "killing Christians" (or something like that).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Hot take scumbag. Who cares? Fuck the pope. His opinion means absolutely nothing. Every less-than-complete-shit-bag-of-a-human has already been saying this for years, without the delusional thinking that their opinion is somehow more special than everyone else's.