this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
4061 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former Fox News commentator has made it clear, in his own book and in interviews, that he believes men and women should not serve together in combat units. If Hegseth is confirmed by the Senate, he could try to end the Pentagon’s nearly decade-old practice of making all combat jobs open to women.

“I’m straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn’t made us more effective. Hasn’t made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated,” he said in a podcast hosted by Shawn Ryan on Nov. 7. Women have a place in the military, he said, just not in special operations, artillery, infantry and armor units.

“Who’s going to replace them? Men? And we’re having trouble recruiting men into the Army right now,” said Lory Manning, a retired Navy captain who works with the Service Women’s Action Network.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Someone who can’t comprehend men and women working together in combat is someone who can’t comprehend working with women.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago

They know they can't work with women because they are fucked up perverts with no self control, that never learned how to be an adult.

I have nothing against normal perverts, just fucked up closeted conservative perverts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I have never fought on the front lines so my opinion shouldn’t matter nearly as much as others with that experience, but it seems like if a woman can pass the same exact physical standards required of infantry units to fight on the front lines, then there would be no harm in doing so. If standards need to be lowered because women generally are smaller and weaker than men, then that’s where I would foresee a problem.

Regardless, a bunch of tankie wannabes on Lemmy most likely have 0 clue of the reality of the situation. Historically, women have fought sparingly in combat roles and have been put in positions that require less physical prowess and more technical skill, I.e. snipers, pilots, drivers, nurses, medics. There is most likely a reason for that that is inclusive of personal choices.

This is one of those issues where Lemmy’s opinion and arguments are the farthest thing from being taken seriously by me.

I’ll wait for the DoD or pentagon to release several studies in which these scenarios were tested and view the results, and base my opinion off of their general consensus.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

Agree. Systems have a way of working things out, in general as long as deciders do so from a pragmatic, not a pre assumptive perspective. I also have not served in a combat role.

As a firefighter, there were several women in my academy class, and several more at my station after academy. They are all as valuable as anyone else on countless calls. But no one is suited for every role.

Only one couldn't complete the training in a satisfactory way, and it was some of the hardest physical things we did. (Dragging a 200lbs dummy through an obstacle course and up a flight of stairs in a certain time, advancing charged 2.5 inch hose as a team, up a commercial highrise stairwell). They matriculated into a backline role as an EMT, studied to specify as a paramedic, and are now an incredible asset. It takes good leadership to get people where they should be.

An important point is: all the other women got that shit done, and are very capable firefighters who have helped the community as such. If they had just be barred from trying, the community would have lost their service.

Everyone is good at something, if they are motivated. There's no reason for people who aren't actually experienced on the topic to be making these decisions. If actual combat leaders make a determination about the requirements to get the job done, that should be the last word on it. (As long as their opinion is grounded in demonstrable examples and transparent training standards)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago

I dream of a day when the locker scene from Starship Troopers becomes reality and men and women who fight alongside one another can share a locker room without complication. Or like... Maybe world piece would be cool too and people wouldn't have to fight at all?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Back? Backwards? Or forwards to the China front line?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

To the 1950s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's cute. You think the front line will be in China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Taiwan is “china” depending on your definition.

Where do you think the front line will be for WWIII?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Eastern Europe, probably, but who knows. It won't be in any nuclear-armed countries (not for any significant amount of time, in any case) because that would provoke nuclear retaliation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

That’s a civil war, hehe. And also a very real possibility.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

Boo hoo, women are complicated. Shut the fuck up.