this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
793 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32317 readers
793 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Another reason to avoid Whole Foods.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And it's also everyone else's prerogative to identify bad faith identity politics running a business and run far away from said business.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Another example of a company with street cred giving it up. If employees felt safe wearing BLM masks to work that meana the company's image as is consistent, even internally.

And they just threw it away.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Whole Foods is not the business it used to be. Not even close. Any semblance of what that store was when it was privately owned is gone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›