this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump's reelection threatens to worsen global climate change by altering the trajectory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, eroding federal climate research and forecasting, and abdicating America's leadership role in global climate negotiations.

Why it matters: His return to the White House comes at a time when climate scientists have warned that the Paris Agreement's warming targets are slipping dangerously out of reach, raising the odds of potentially catastrophic consequences.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know why the focus is on US emissions and not production.

We produced more fossil fuels under Biden than trump, the difference is we use fossil fuels to ship the rest of the fossil fuels half way around the planet for them to burn over there.

Shit will get worse, but it has been getting worse longer than most of us have been alive.

If the best we can ever do is slow down the increase of damage rate, we're just mopping the deck of the Titanic while it goes down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Importing fossil fuels is more of an accelerant to climate change than domestic production. Approximately 40% of global cargo ships are carrying fossil fuels.

Increased production does not imply increased consumption. Our dependence on fossil fuel has decreased, and renewable energy consumption has increased, in the last four years.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=62444

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know why the focus is on US emissions and not production.

We produced more fossil fuels under Biden than trump

That's why. The sections of the billionaire-owned media that don't deny anthropogenic climate change or pretend that it's a good thing all have a vested interest in pretending that Dem leadership can do no wrong.

If the best we can ever do is slow down the increase of damage rate, we're just mopping the deck of the Titanic while it goes down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's like people really want to still brag about "Biden's signature climate legislation" despite fossil fuel companies publicly asking for trump to keep it, because it's making them so much money.

Rather than just doing what Dem voters want and getting the votes, Dem politicians keep doing what Dem voters hate for the donation money, then try to use it to convince all the people they pissed off to still vote for them.

If the goal is electing Dems the DNC is completely incapable.

If their goal is making sure billionaires keep accumulating wealth tho, they're doing a great job ensuring regardless of who wins an election the wealthy always make more money.